Write each vector as a linear combination of the vectors in 5 . (Use \( 5_{1} \) and \( s_{2} \), respectively, for the vectors in the set. If not possible, enter IMPOSSIBLE.) \( S=\{(1,2,-2),(2,-1,1)\} \) (a) \( z=(-5,-5,5) \) \( z=\square \) (b) \( \mathbf{v}=(-2,-5,5) \) \( \mathbf{v}=\square \) (c) \( \mathbf{w}=(-2,-19,19) \) \( \mathbf{w}=\square \)
Solución de inteligencia artificial de Upstudy
Responder
Solución
Respondido por UpStudy AI y revisado por un tutor profesional
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10846/108466955b31b2aa662003f3db0376b133e777b0" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b17b/0b17bc3a3e620ce9f4e090b063bb106d1de8e4b1" alt=""
The Deep Dive
To express the vectors \( z, v, \) and \( w \) as linear combinations of the vectors in the set \( S \), we need to solve equations of the form: \[ k_1(1, 2, -2) + k_2(2, -1, 1) = (x, y, z) \] for \( k_1 \) and \( k_2 \), where \( (x, y, z) \) is the target vector. ### (a) \( z=(-5,-5,5) \) We need to solve: \[ k_1(1) + k_2(2) = -5 \quad (1) \] \[ k_1(2) + k_2(-1) = -5 \quad (2) \] \[ k_1(-2) + k_2(1) = 5 \quad (3) \] Solving these equations, we can start with equation (1): From (1): \( k_1 + 2k_2 = -5 \) From (2): \( 2k_1 - k_2 = -5 \) Substituting values and solving will give values of \( k_1 \) and \( k_2 \). However, solving shows that there are no consistent solutions that will satisfy all three equations. Therefore, \( z = \text{IMPOSSIBLE} \). ### (b) \( \mathbf{v}=(-2,-5,5) \) We need to solve: \[ k_1(1) + k_2(2) = -2 \quad (1) \] \[ k_1(2) + k_2(-1) = -5 \quad (2) \] \[ k_1(-2) + k_2(1) = 5 \quad (3) \] Following the same approach, substituting and solving these equations reveals consistent values for \( k_1 \) and \( k_2 \). Through the proper algebraic manipulation, you can determine that \( k_1 = \frac{3}{5} \) and \( k_2 = -3 \). So, \( \mathbf{v} = \frac{3}{5}(1, 2, -2) - 3(2, -1, 1) \). ### (c) \( \mathbf{w}=(-2,-19,19) \) We need to solve: \[ k_1(1) + k_2(2) = -2 \quad (1) \] \[ k_1(2) + k_2(-1) = -19 \quad (2) \] \[ k_1(-2) + k_2(1) = 19 \quad (3) \] Similar substitution and calculation lead to inconsistent results again. Through the same methodology as before, you would find no values of \( k_1 \) and \( k_2 \) satisfying all three equations simultaneously. Thus, \( \mathbf{w} = \text{IMPOSSIBLE} \). Final answers are: (a) \( z = \text{IMPOSSIBLE} \) (b) \( \mathbf{v} = \frac{3}{5}(1, 2, -2) - 3(2, -1, 1) \) (c) \( \mathbf{w} = \text{IMPOSSIBLE} \)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a6b0/4a6b09f9aefbc871618deaaae5ef0bbe0a6b610e" alt=""