Select the evidence that the author provides for the following supporting claim: the economic Education and regulation are effective tools for reducing tobacco smoking. Tobacco exports account for hundreds of millions in United States revenue. With tobacco taxes gone, the tobacco industry would make more money off its sales. Due to the scarcity principle, more people would spend money on banned tobacco products.

The author might point to the fact that despite the revenue generated from tobacco exports, higher taxes and strict regulations on tobacco can lead to a decrease in smoking rates. This relationship illustrates that financial and regulatory measures effectively discourage consumption. Additionally, the suggestion that eliminating taxes could actually result in increased ability for the industry to profit highlights the counterintuitive outcomes of regulation, showing that careful economic policies can lead to better public health outcomes. Furthermore, the mention of the scarcity principle signifies how regulations could paradoxically lead to an increase in interest in smoking among young people. This underscores the importance of strategically implementing education and regulation to ensure they lead to desired health outcomes instead of unintended consequences.