Select the three supporting claims that the author makes to argue that legal curfews for teens are an unnecessary violation of individual liberties and should be abolished. Youth curfew enforcement does not effectively reduce urban crime. Youth curfew laws violate the rights of parents. Youth curfews may be enforced in a racially discriminatory way. Youth curfew laws discriminate against young people.

Many studies have shown that youth curfews have little to no measurable impact on reducing urban crime rates. In fact, some research suggests that crime continues at similar levels regardless of whether curfews are in place, leaving one to wonder if they are simply an exercise in futility rather than an effective crime prevention strategy. Additionally, curfews can often lead to racial profiling and discrimination in enforcement. Minority communities may see a disproportionate number of curfew violations, which raises concerns about fairness and equality under the law, essentially labeling an entire demographic as problematic based purely on their age or ethnicity. This can further exacerbate tensions between law enforcement and the communities they serve.