14 Multiple Choice 4 points On what grounds did the U.S. Supreme Court rule that several New Deal programs were unconstitutional? The federal government had no right to interfere in businesses operating in a single state. New Deal programs failed to protect the rights of minorities. New Deal programs were interfering too much with interstate commerce. The federal government needed to take stronger action to promote the general welfare. 11 T

To determine the grounds on which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled several New Deal programs unconstitutional, we can analyze the options provided: 1. **The federal government had no right to interfere in businesses operating in a single state.** This option reflects the Court's concern about federal overreach into state matters, particularly in cases where businesses were not engaged in interstate commerce. 2. **New Deal programs failed to protect the rights of minorities.** While this is a significant issue, it was not the primary legal basis for the Supreme Court's rulings against New Deal programs. 3. **New Deal programs were interfering too much with interstate commerce.** This option aligns with the Court's interpretation of the Commerce Clause, where they ruled that some New Deal programs overstepped the federal government's authority regarding interstate commerce. 4. **The federal government needed to take stronger action to promote the general welfare.** This statement contradicts the Court's rulings, as the Court was often concerned about the extent of federal intervention rather than advocating for more. Based on this analysis, the most accurate answer is: **The federal government had no right to interfere in businesses operating in a single state.** This reflects the Supreme Court's rulings that emphasized limitations on federal power concerning state affairs and commerce.