Question
upstudy study bank question image url

Kilimani Company Limited owns and sells houses around Nyashishi area in Mwanza. Assume further that the city council has built a new garbage collection area in Nyashishi. The following equation relates housing prices (price) to distance from the recently built garbage collection point (dist). \[ \log (\text { price })=9.40+0.312 \log \text { (dist) } \] \[ n=135, R^{2}=0.162 \] a) Interpret the coefficient on \( \log ( \) dist). Is the sign of this estimate what you expect it to be? ( 7.5 marks) b) What other factors about a house affect its price? ( 7.5 marks) c) How much variation in the dependent variable price is explained by the independent variable distance? (Hint: utilize the \( R \)-squared.) ( 7.5 marks)

Ask by King Sanders. in Tanzania
Feb 24,2025

Upstudy AI Solution

Tutor-Verified Answer

Answer

a) The coefficient of 0.312 means that for every 1% increase in distance from the garbage collection area, the house price increases by approximately 0.312%. This is expected because houses farther away from a nuisance are generally more expensive. b) Other factors affecting house prices include the size of the house, number of rooms, age and condition, location (proximity to amenities), neighborhood quality, architectural style, and market conditions. c) The R² value of 0.162 indicates that about 16.2% of the variation in house prices is explained by the distance from the garbage collection area.

Solution

Below is a detailed explanation of each part. ────────────────────────────── a) Interpreting the Coefficient on log(dist) The regression equation is given as:   log(price) = 9.40 + 0.312 log(dist) Here, the coefficient on log(dist) is 0.312. Because both the dependent and independent variables are in logarithms, this coefficient tells us the elasticity of house prices with respect to distance from the garbage collection area. In other words, a 1% increase in distance from the garbage collection point is associated with an average increase in house price of about 0.312%. Is the sign as expected? Yes. Since the garbage collection area is likely seen as a nuisance, houses closer to it might be less desirable (and hence less expensive). The positive coefficient indicates that as the distance increases (i.e., the house is farther away from the garbage collection point), the house price tends to be higher, which is what we would anticipate. ────────────────────────────── b) Other Factors that Might Affect House Prices House prices are influenced by a variety of factors other than just the distance from undesirable amenities. Some of these factors include: • Size or Square Footage – Larger houses or lots generally command higher prices. • Number of Bedrooms and Bathrooms – More rooms typically increase the value. • Age and Condition – Newer or well-maintained houses tend to be priced higher. • Location – Proximity to good schools, shopping centers, transportation, parks, and other neighborhood amenities. • Neighborhood Quality – Includes factors like safety, public services, and overall desirability. • Architectural Style and Interior Quality – Unique designs or high-quality finishes may increase prices. • Market Conditions – Broader economic factors and supply and demand in the housing market. • Environmental Factors – Aside from the garbage collection point, factors such as noise, pollution, and scenic quality can also play a role. ────────────────────────────── c) Variation in Price Explained by Distance The R² value provided is 0.162. In the context of a regression, R² measures the proportion of the variation in the dependent variable that is explained by the independent variable(s) in the model. Since R² = 0.162, this means that approximately 16.2% of the variation in log(price) is explained by log(dist). In other words, when we use the distance from the garbage collection area to predict the house price, we are accounting for 16.2% of the variability in house prices. The remaining 83.8% of the variation is explained by other factors not included in this simple regression model. ────────────────────────────── Summary Answer a) The coefficient of 0.312 means that a 1% increase in the distance from the garbage collection point is associated with a 0.312% increase in the price of a house. This positive sign is as expected since being further away from a potentially undesirable garbage collection area should make a house more attractive and hence more expensive. b) Other factors affecting house prices could include the size of the house, number of rooms, age, condition, location (access to amenities, schools, and employment centers), architectural style, neighborhood characteristics, market conditions, and environmental quality, among others. c) With an R² of 0.162, about 16.2% of the variation in the (log of) house prices is explained by the (log of) distance from the garbage collection area.

Answered by UpStudy AI and reviewed by a Professional Tutor

error msg
Explain
Simplify this solution

The Deep Dive

The coefficient on \( \log(\text{dist}) \) is 0.312, indicating that an increase in the distance from the garbage collection point is associated with a percentage increase in housing prices, since we’re observing a log-log relationship. Specifically, a 1% increase in distance is expected to lead to approximately a 0.312% increase in the house price. The positive sign here might be unexpected; typically, one would expect proximity to undesirable features, like a garbage collection area, to decrease house prices. In addition to distance from the garbage collection point, several other factors can influence housing prices. These include the size of the house (in square feet), the number of bedrooms and bathrooms, the condition and age of the property, neighborhood safety, local school quality, and nearby amenities such as parks or shopping centers. Each of these aspects can significantly impact how buyers perceive value and set their willingness to pay. The \( R^{2} \) value of 0.162 suggests that approximately 16.2% of the variation in the housing price can be explained by the distance from the garbage collection point. This implies that while distance is a relevant factor, there are many other elements contributing to housing price fluctuations that are not captured by this model. Thus, the model may need to be expanded to include more predictors for a more comprehensive understanding of pricing dynamics.

Related Questions

Try Premium now!
Try Premium and ask Thoth AI unlimited math questions now!
Maybe later Go Premium
Study can be a real struggle
Why not UpStudy it?
Select your plan below
Premium

You can enjoy

Start now
  • Step-by-step explanations
  • 24/7 expert live tutors
  • Unlimited number of questions
  • No interruptions
  • Full access to Answer and Solution
  • Full Access to PDF Chat, UpStudy Chat, Browsing Chat
Basic

Totally free but limited

  • Limited Solution
Welcome to UpStudy!
Please sign in to continue the Thoth AI Chat journey
Continue with Email
Or continue with
By clicking “Sign in”, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy