Question
5 from Unit 6, Lesson 11 Find two different ways to rewrite \( 3 x y+6 y z \) using the distributive property.
Ask by Simpson Haynes. in the United States
Feb 25,2025
Upstudy AI Solution
Tutor-Verified Answer
Answer
There are two ways to rewrite \( 3xy + 6yz \) using the distributive property:
1. **Method 1**: Factor out \( 3y \):
\[
3y(x + 2z)
\]
2. **Method 2**: Group and factor out \( 3y \):
\[
3y(x + 2z)
\]
Both methods result in the same factored form.
Solution
To rewrite the expression \( 3xy + 6yz \) using the distributive property, we can approach it in two different ways.
### Method 1: Factoring out the common factor
1. **Identify the common factor**: In the expression \( 3xy + 6yz \), we can see that \( 3y \) is a common factor.
2. **Factor out the common factor**: We can factor \( 3y \) out of both terms:
\[
3xy + 6yz = 3y(x + 2z)
\]
### Method 2: Grouping the terms differently
1. **Group the terms**: We can also group the terms in a different way. Let's factor out \( 3z \) from the second term:
\[
3xy + 6yz = 3xy + 3(2yz)
\]
2. **Factor out \( 3y \)**: Now we can factor out \( 3y \) from the entire expression:
\[
3y(x + 2z)
\]
### Summary of the two methods
1. From Method 1, we have:
\[
3y(x + 2z)
\]
2. From Method 2, we also arrive at:
\[
3y(x + 2z)
\]
Both methods yield the same factored form, but they illustrate different approaches to applying the distributive property.
Answered by UpStudy AI and reviewed by a Professional Tutor
Like
error msg
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10846/108466955b31b2aa662003f3db0376b133e777b0" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b17b/0b17bc3a3e620ce9f4e090b063bb106d1de8e4b1" alt=""
The Deep Dive
One way to rewrite \( 3xy + 6yz \) is by factoring out the common term \( 3y \): \[ 3y(x + 2z) \]. This showcases how both terms share a \( 3y \) factor, making it easy to identify that the expression can be simplified. Another approach is to group the terms differently by factoring out \( 3z \) when it applies: \[ 3y(x + 2z) \]. In this case, we can think of the expression in terms of \( z \) as well if it were adjusted to include a scenario where \( z \) is factored out, although it primarily highlights the first method.