Let $$ p $$ and $$ q $$ be the following statements. $$ p $$ : Reuben is singing. $$ q $$ : Charmaine is in photography class. Consider this argument. Premise 1: If Reuben is singing, then Charmaine is in photography class. Premise 2: Charmaine is in photography class. Conclusion: Therefore, Reuben is singing. (a) Write the argument in symbolic form. Premise $$ 2: $$ Try one last time $$ p \rightarrow q $$

Question

UpStudy AI · Accepted Answer

To express the argument in symbolic form, we will use the following symbols:

- Let $$ p $$ represent "Reuben is singing."
- Let $$ q $$ represent "Charmaine is in photography class."

Now, we can write the premises and conclusion as follows:

1. **Premise 1**: If Reuben is singing, then Charmaine is in photography class.
   - Symbolically: $$ p \rightarrow q $$

2. **Premise 2**: Charmaine is in photography class.
   - Symbolically: $$ q $$

3. **Conclusion**: Therefore, Reuben is singing.
   - Symbolically: $$ p $$

Putting it all together, the argument in symbolic form is:

1. $$ p \rightarrow q $$ (If Reuben is singing, then Charmaine is in photography class.)
2. $$ q $$ (Charmaine is in photography class.)
3. Therefore, $$ p $$ (Reuben is singing.)

This argument is an example of the fallacy known as "affirming the consequent," where the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises.
The argument in symbolic form is: 1. $$ p \rightarrow q $$ (If Reuben is singing, then Charmaine is in photography class.) 2. $$ q $$ (Charmaine is in photography class.) 3. Therefore, $$ p $$ (Reuben is singing.)

Upstudy AI Solution

Answer

Solution

Bonus Knowledge

Related Questions

Latest Other Questions