Question
Upstudy AI Solution
Tutor-Verified Answer
Answer
Jackson closed the National Bank by vetoing its recharter and removing federal funds, which weakened its financial base and led to its closure.
Solution
-
Opposition to Concentrated Power
Jackson believed that the Second Bank of the United States concentrated too much financial power in the hands of a wealthy elite, which he saw as a threat to democratic principles. -
Veto of the Recharter Bill
When Congress proposed to renew the bank’s charter, Jackson used his presidential veto power to block the recharter. This veto was grounded in his view that the bank was unconstitutional and undemocratic. -
Removal of Federal Deposits
Following the veto, Jackson ordered the removal of federal deposits from the national bank. He transferred these funds to various state banks, often called “pet banks,” which he deemed more favorable to the interests of the common people. -
Resulting Closure of the Bank
By withdrawing federal support and funds, Jackson effectively weakened the bank’s financial stability. Without critical federal deposits and the recharter, the bank lost its national significance and operational viability, leading to its closure.
Thus, Jackson closed the National Bank by vetoing its recharter and withdrawing federal deposits, thereby dismantling its financial foundation.
Answered by UpStudy AI and reviewed by a Professional Tutor
Like
error msg
Explain 
Simplify this solution Mind Expander
Andrew Jackson famously took a strong stance against the Second Bank of the United States, viewing it as a symbol of elitism and a threat to state rights. In 1833, he decided to withdraw federal funds from the bank and transfer them to state banks, a move often referred to as the “bank war.” This effectively crippled the bank’s power and led to its eventual demise in 1836, when its charter was not renewed.
This bold and controversial move not only sparked fierce political battles but also had lasting effects on the American banking system, paving the way for the rise of state banks and the era of “free banking” that followed. Jackson’s actions ignited debates over fiscal policy and government control that still echo in financial discussions today!
