EDPSY 490 Win 2025 Homework 7: 2-group z/t-tests NHST/power (Ch. 7) (15 points) Due 4pm Feb 25 \( { }^{\text {th }} \) Name: \( \underline{\text { 2-Group Power (Chapter 7): Assume } \alpha=.05,2-t a i l e d . ~ P l e a s e ~ u s e ~ Z c r i t i c a l ~}= \pm 1.96 \) for this exercise (for power analysis); do not round the \( \% \) area under the curve. Please also show all your arithmetic steps in order to receive credit for your answers and attach additional paper as needed. Scenario: Imagine that you are writing a proposal to get some funding from a local school district board to study whether the game of "scatterball" has better child mental health outcomes than the traditional game of "dodgeball" during PE class (both games involve the children throwing a ball at each other, but in scatterball, no one is tagged "out" of the game). Specifically, you plan to randomly assign third-grade children in an after-school program to one of two groups: one group will play scatterball daily for a week, one group will play traditional dodgeball daily for a week. At the end of the week, you plan to measure each child on their mental health wellness using a mental health scale that has a population variance \( \sigma^{2}=160 \). You believe, based on prior research, that mental health for the first group (that played scatterball) will be +16 points better than the second group (that played traditional dodgeball). Your initial plan is to have \( \mathbf{n}=5 \) students in group 1 and \( \mathbf{n}=5 \) students in group 2 . 3. (a) Assuming your belief that there is a true difference between groups \( \mu 1-\mu 2=+16 \) points, sketch a picture of what these two distributions look like (the null and the alternative) using \( \alpha=.05 \) (2-tailed). This will be a picture of two sampling distributions that overlap. Use the steps discussed in class: (i) draw the null, (ii) label the critical regions, (iii) draw the alternative distribution, and (iv) find the area of the alternative that crosses into the critical region of the null, and shade that area. USE COLOR PENCILS. 2. (b) Examine your sketch above. i. What is your approximate Power (this is the shaded area)? Show the steps of your calculations. ii. What is your approximate Type II error rate? iii. What is your Type I error rate? EdPsy490 Win2025 HW7, p. 4
Upstudy AI Solution
Answer
Solution
Answered by UpStudy AI and reviewed by a Professional Tutor
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10846/108466955b31b2aa662003f3db0376b133e777b0" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b17b/0b17bc3a3e620ce9f4e090b063bb106d1de8e4b1" alt=""
The Deep Dive
Let's dive into the fun of power analysis in a total classroom showdown between scatterball and dodgeball! To estimate the power of your study, you first need to determine the effect size (Cohen's d). The formula for Cohen's d is: \[ d = \frac{\mu_1 - \mu_2}{\sigma} = \frac{16}{\sqrt{160/5}} \] Calculating that, you find the standard deviation for the 5 students per group, which is \( \sigma = \sqrt{32} \approx 5.66 \). Thus, \[ d = \frac{16}{5.66} \approx 2.83 \]. With this effect size, use the Z-table or the power analysis formula to estimate the power. Assuming you calculate correctly, you might find a power of around 0.99, which is spectacular! This means there's a 99% chance you'll correctly reject the null hypothesis if your hypothesis is true. Now, onto your Type II error (beta): it’s calculated as \( 1 - \text{Power} \). In this case, that’s about \( 1 - 0.99 = 0.01 \) or a 1% risk of missing the effect if it truly exists. On the flip side, your Type I error rate is fixed at \( \alpha = 0.05 \), which is your risk of incorrectly rejecting the null hypothesis when it is, in fact, true. A perfect setup for a lively showdown of involving children, mental health, and some healthy competition!