Question
Fossil A is found closer to the surface compared to Fossil B. Which of the following conclusions can be made based on this statement? (1 point) Fossil A is trom an older species than Fossil B. Fossil B is most likely older than Fossil A. The species of Fossil A existed at the same time as the species of Fossil B. The species of Fossil A evolved trom the species of Fossil B.
Ask by Donnelly Guzman. in the United States
Mar 12,2025
Upstudy AI Solution
Tutor-Verified Answer
Answer
Fossil B is most likely older than Fossil A.
Solution
1. Given that Fossil A is found closer to the surface than Fossil B, we can assume that Fossil A comes from a more recent sediment layer, while Fossil B comes from a deeper, and thus older, layer.
2. According to the principle of stratigraphy, older layers are found deeper in the Earth. Thus, the fossil from the lower (deeper) layer is generally the older one.
3. Therefore, if fossil layers are undisturbed, we can conclude:
\[
\text{Fossil B (deeper) is older than Fossil A (closer to the surface)}
\]
4. Among the options provided, the conclusion that fits this logic is:
\[
\textbf{Fossil B is most likely older than Fossil A.}
\]
Answered by UpStudy AI and reviewed by a Professional Tutor
Like
error msg
Explain 
Simplify this solution Mind Expander
Fossil B is most likely older than Fossil A. In geological terms, the principle of superposition states that in undisturbed layers of rock, older layers are found beneath younger layers. Since Fossil A is found closer to the surface, it suggests that it was buried more recently compared to Fossil B. This concept plays a significant role in paleontology and archaeology. By examining the layers of sedimentary rock, researchers can establish a timeline of species existence and extinction, helping to construct a detailed history of life on Earth. It's fascinating how the layering of rocks acts much like a book where each layer tells a part of the story!
