Question
COMPROMISE OF 1850- Why needed? Who? Issues/ Major?
Northerners got? Southerners got?
Northerners got? Southerners got?
Ask by Schwartz Li. in the United States
Mar 23,2025
Upstudy AI Solution
Tutor-Verified Answer
Answer
Compromise of 1850:
- Why Needed: To resolve tensions over slavery in new territories and prevent the country from splitting.
- Key Figures: Henry Clay and Stephen A. Douglas.
- Issues: Slavery in new territories, Fugitive Slave Act, and statehood for California.
- Benefits for Northerners: California as a free state and abolition of the slave trade in Washington, D.C.
- Benefits for Southerners: Stricter Fugitive Slave Act and the possibility of allowing slavery in new territories via popular sovereignty.
This compromise aimed to balance the interests of both North and South by addressing key slavery-related issues in the newly acquired territories.
Solution
1. Why was the Compromise of 1850 Needed?
- Expansion and New Territories: Following the Mexican–American War, the United States acquired vast territories. A key question arose: would slavery be allowed in these new areas?
- Sectional Tensions: Northern and Southern states held opposing views on slavery. The North increasingly opposed the extension of slavery, while the South sought to protect its interests.
- Avoiding Disunion: With tensions running high, compromise was necessary to avoid secession and possible civil conflict.
2. Who Was Involved?
- Key Politicians:
- Senator Henry Clay of Kentucky played a central role in orchestrating the compromise.
- Senator Stephen A. Douglas of Illinois also contributed by advocating for popular sovereignty in some territories.
- Congressional Involvement: Both houses of Congress had to negotiate terms acceptable to both pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions.
3. Major Issues Addressed
- Slavery in New Territories: Determining whether territories acquired from Mexico would be allowed to choose slavery.
- State vs. Territory Status: Debates on admitting new states as either free or slave-holding.
- Fugitive Slave Act: One of the most contentious aspects, this law required that escaped slaves be returned to their masters even if found in free states.
- Slave Trade in Washington, D.C.: The compromise also moved to restrict the slave trade (though not slavery itself) in the nation’s capital.
- Popular Sovereignty: The idea that the residents of a territory should decide on the issue of slavery was applied to some regions, allowing them to choose the status of slavery eventually.
4. What Did Each Side Get?
-
Benefits for Northerners:
- California as a Free State: California was admitted to the Union as a free state, preventing the spread of slavery westward in that way.
- Abolition of the Slave Trade in D.C.: Although slavery was still allowed, the slave trade in the nation’s capital was abolished as a symbolic step.
- Influence in New Territories: The territories of New Mexico and Utah were given the status of popular sovereignty, which many Northerners hoped would eventually lead to free states.
-
Benefits for Southerners:
- Stronger Fugitive Slave Act: Southern interests were secured by a stricter Fugitive Slave Law, which ensured that escaped slaves would be returned, even from free states.
- Popular Sovereignty in New Territories: This allowed the possibility for slaveholding in new territories if the residents chose so, preserving Southern interests.
- Balancing the State Count: Despite the creation of a free state in California, the overall balance was maintained by leaving the status of other territories up to local decision-making.
Summary
The Compromise of 1850 was a package of five bills aimed at defusing sectional tensions by addressing issues such as the status of slavery in newly acquired territories, the balance between free and slave states, and the enforcement of laws regarding fugitive slaves. Northerners gained by having California admitted as a free state and by restricting the slave trade in Washington, D.C., while Southerners were reassured by the stricter Fugitive Slave Act and the possibility of allowing slavery in new territories via popular sovereignty.
Answered by UpStudy AI and reviewed by a Professional Tutor
Like
error msg
Explain 
Simplify this solution Bonus Knowledge
The Compromise of 1850 was needed to ease tensions between the North and South over the issues of slavery and territorial expansion. After the Mexican-American War, the question of whether newly acquired territories would permit slavery created a deep divide. Prominent figures such as Henry Clay, Daniel Webster, and John C. Calhoun played pivotal roles in crafting the compromise, aiming to find a middle ground to prevent civil conflict.
Northerners gained the abolition of the slave trade in Washington D.C. and the admission of California as a free state, while Southerners benefited from the implementation of a stricter Fugitive Slave Act, which required that escaped slaves be returned to their owners. This compromise was a temporary fix, reflecting deep-seated divides that would eventually lead to the Civil War.
