Question \#7 of 23 Which is NOT true regarding liability for cleaning up uncontrolled hazardous waste sites under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability, (CERCLA)? A) A landowner who is not responsible for the contamination on his property can seek reimbursement from previous landowners or other responsible parties; but if other parties are not available, even a landowner who did not cause the problem could be solely responsible for the costs. B) A landowner may be liable for cleanup when contamination exists - regardless of whether the contamination is the result of the landowner's actions or those of others. C) A landlowner's liability for hazardous waste site cleanup includes the cleanup of only the landowner's property. D) Potential responsible parties are identified and ordered to take responsibility for the cleanup.
Upstudy AI Solution
Answer
Solution
Answered by UpStudy AI and reviewed by a Professional Tutor


Beyond the Answer
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), often referred to as Superfund, was enacted in 1980 in response to growing concerns about the environmental and health risks posed by hazardous waste sites. It empowers the federal government to respond to releases or threats of hazardous substances, facilitating the cleanup of polluted sites while holding parties responsible for contamination accountable, regardless of when the contamination occurred. In terms of real-world application, if you find yourself in a situation as a landowner dealing with contamination, the implications of CERCLA can be significant. Even if you were completely unaware of the hazardous materials present on your property, you could be held liable for cleanup costs. Understanding this law is crucial for anyone purchasing property that may have had previous industrial use or other activities that could leave a toxic legacy. Always consult environmental assessments before purchasing!