Tables should be used instead of charts when the reader need not differentiate the columns and rows the values being displayed have different units or very different magnitudes there are more than two columns of data the reader needs relative comparisons of data

To determine when tables should be used instead of charts, let's analyze the conditions provided: 1. **The reader need not differentiate the columns and rows**: - Tables are suitable when the reader is looking for specific values rather than trends or relationships. If the data is straightforward and does not require visual differentiation, a table is appropriate. 2. **The values being displayed have different units or very different magnitudes**: - When data involves different units (e.g., dollars, percentages, counts) or varies significantly in scale, tables can present this information clearly without the risk of misinterpretation that can occur in charts. 3. **There are more than two columns of data**: - Tables can effectively organize and display multiple columns of data, making it easier for readers to compare values across different categories. Charts may become cluttered or confusing with too many data series. 4. **The reader needs relative comparisons of data**: - While charts are often used for visual comparisons, tables can also facilitate relative comparisons, especially when precise values are necessary. Readers can easily scan rows and columns to find relationships. Based on these points, tables should be used instead of charts in the following scenarios: - When specific values are more important than trends. - When data involves different units or magnitudes. - When there are multiple columns of data. - When precise relative comparisons are needed. In summary, tables are preferable in situations where clarity, precision, and organization of diverse data types are essential.