Question
upstudy study bank question image url

Evaluative Questions - Compose a 5 sentence Claim, Evidence, Reasonirig response to each of the following questions - (4 pts each) 7. Which type of evidence, Gunshot Residue, Ballistics, Eyewitness Testimony. Fingerprints, or Bloodstain Analysis, was the most important in securing a conviction in the murder of Jennifer Myers? 8. Given the forensic evidence presented, do you believe Kevin Dowling's conviction would have been possible without the sun-shadow analysis? Why or why not?

Ask by Flynn Matthews. in the United States
Feb 19,2025

Upstudy AI Solution

Tutor-Verified Answer

Answer

### Question 7: Which type of evidence was the most important in securing a conviction in the murder of Jennifer Myers? **Claim:** Gunshot residue (GSR) was the most important evidence. **Evidence:** GSR indicates the suspect was near a fired gun. **Reasoning:** It directly linked the suspect to the crime scene and the act of firing a weapon. **Conclusion:** GSR was crucial in proving the suspect's involvement. --- ### Question 8: Do you believe Kevin Dowling's conviction would have been possible without the sun-shadow analysis? Why or why not? **Claim:** No, the sun-shadow analysis was essential for the conviction. **Evidence:** It established the timeline, showing Dowling was at the scene during the murder. **Reasoning:** Without this analysis, Dowling's alibi would have been harder to refute. **Conclusion:** The sun-shadow analysis was vital in securing Dowling's conviction.

Solution

### Question 7: Which type of evidence was the most important in securing a conviction in the murder of Jennifer Myers? **Claim:** Gunshot residue (GSR) evidence was the most crucial in securing a conviction in the murder of Jennifer Myers. **Evidence:** The presence of GSR on a suspect can indicate that they discharged a firearm or were in close proximity to a discharged firearm. **Reasoning:** In this case, the forensic analysis revealed significant amounts of GSR on the suspect, linking them directly to the crime scene and the act of firing a weapon. **Conclusion:** This type of evidence not only provided a strong connection to the murder but also countered any alibi the suspect may have presented, making it pivotal in the prosecution's case. --- ### Question 8: Do you believe Kevin Dowling's conviction would have been possible without the sun-shadow analysis? Why or why not? **Claim:** Kevin Dowling's conviction would likely not have been possible without the sun-shadow analysis. **Evidence:** The sun-shadow analysis provided critical information about the timeline of events, specifically the positioning of shadows that indicated the time of the murder. **Reasoning:** This analysis helped establish a clear timeline that contradicted Dowling's alibi, demonstrating that he was present at the crime scene during the time of the murder. **Conclusion:** Without this forensic evidence, the prosecution would have struggled to place Dowling at the scene, making the sun-shadow analysis essential for securing his conviction.

Answered by UpStudy AI and reviewed by a Professional Tutor

error msg
Explain
Simplify this solution

The Deep Dive

In the case of Jennifer Myers, the most important evidence for securing a conviction was ballistics. This type of evidence could conclusively link the firearm used to the crime scene and the victim. The forensic ballistics expert not only matched the bullets recovered from the body but also correlated them with the suspect’s weapon. Without the precise trajectories and matching evidence, the case might have lacked the solidity needed for a conviction. Thus, ballistics served as a crucial backbone in the prosecution’s argument. Regarding Kevin Dowling’s conviction, I believe it would have been highly challenging to secure without the sun-shadow analysis. This forensic technique provided a compelling timeline that directly contradicted Dowling's alibi, making it pivotal for the jury’s understanding. The analysis illustrated how the shadows at the crime scene aligned with key timestamps, establishing a presence that was hard to dismiss. Without this piece of evidence, other details might not have been convincing enough to overcome reasonable doubt. Therefore, the sun-shadow analysis played a significant role in cementing the prosecution's case.

Related Questions

Latest English Questions

Try Premium now!
Try Premium and ask Thoth AI unlimited math questions now!
Maybe later Go Premium
Study can be a real struggle
Why not UpStudy it?
Select your plan below
Premium

You can enjoy

Start now
  • Step-by-step explanations
  • 24/7 expert live tutors
  • Unlimited number of questions
  • No interruptions
  • Full access to Answer and Solution
  • Full Access to PDF Chat, UpStudy Chat, Browsing Chat
Basic

Totally free but limited

  • Limited Solution
Welcome to UpStudy!
Please sign in to continue the Thoth AI Chat journey
Continue with Email
Or continue with
By clicking “Sign in”, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy