Nathan is trying to get his son to stop playing a certain video game. Which is a strategy Nathan could use to not only help his son stop playing the game but also believe he does not really want to play the game? misattribution of arousal minimal deterrence effort justification induced hypocrisy paradigm

To help Nathan effectively address his son's video game playing, let's analyze the strategies provided: 1. **Misattribution of Arousal**: This involves changing the context in which emotions are experienced, leading someone to misattribute their feelings. While it can influence behavior, it may not directly lead to a belief that he doesn't want to play the game. 2. **Minimal Deterrence**: This strategy involves using a small consequence to discourage behavior. It may not be effective in changing the son's belief about wanting to play the game. 3. **Effort Justification**: This refers to the tendency to attribute greater value to an outcome if a lot of effort was put into achieving it. This could lead to a belief that the game is not worth the effort, but it doesn't directly address stopping the game. 4. **Induced Hypocrisy Paradigm**: This strategy involves making someone aware of the discrepancy between their beliefs and their actions, which can lead to a change in behavior. By highlighting the negative aspects of playing the game and contrasting them with the son's stated beliefs or values, Nathan could help his son realize that he doesn't truly want to play the game. Given these analyses, the most effective strategy for Nathan to help his son stop playing the game and believe he does not really want to play it would be the **induced hypocrisy paradigm**. This approach encourages self-reflection and can lead to a change in both behavior and belief.