A lobbyist wants a senator to change her vote on a bill supported by the lobbyist's employer. He bribes the senator with a large donation to her personal bank account. Which negative aspect of interest groups does the scenario illustrate? A. Lacking power without funding B. Resorting to unethical tactics C. Focusing only on group members' goals D. Supporting inexperienced candidates for office

This scenario clearly illustrates the second option. When a lobbyist resorts to bribery to influence a senator's vote, it highlights the unethical tactics that can arise from interest groups trying to exert their influence. Such actions not only undermine the trust in political systems but also create a toxic environment where decisions may be driven by ulterior motives rather than the public good. Moreover, this type of behavior can have far-reaching consequences, such as weakening democracy and increasing public skepticism towards lawmakers. When interest groups prioritize personal gains over ethical engagement, they risk damaging the integrity of the legislative process and eroding public confidence in elected officials.