Which logical fallacy is used in the text? Don't be deceived by Kate Santiago's articles on rural, blue-collar workers. Her husband is a fancy investment banker, so she can't possibly understand their situation. appeal to nature: the assumption that natural things are always good slippery slope fallacy: the false assumption that a small first step will lead to extreme consequences guilt by association: a negative association intended to discredit someone or something straw man: a misrepresentation of an opponent's position that makes it easier to argue against

In this scenario, the logical fallacy at play is a negative association intended to discredit someone or something. By pointing out that Kate Santiago’s husband is a fancy investment banker, it implies that she can’t relate to or understand the struggles of rural, blue-collar workers simply because of his profession. It's an unfair tactic meant to undermine her credibility based on her association rather than her arguments or experiences. This fallacy often pops up in debates and discussions, where individuals rely on irrelevant personal details to attack someone's character instead of addressing the actual points being made. It's like saying someone can't be a good chef just because their sibling is a fast-food worker! Ignoring the merits of the argument doesn’t lead to constructive conversation, so be mindful of keeping the focus where it belongs.