In a product liability case, a company can settie out of court for a loss of \( \$ 350,000 \), or go to trial, losing \( \$ 1,200,000 \) if found guilty and nothing if found not guilty. Lawyers for the company estimate the probability of a not-gulity verdict to be 0.8. Complete parts (a) through (b) below. a. What is the expected value of the amount the company can lose by taking the case to court? 240000 b. Should the company settie out of court? A. The company should settle out of court, since the amount it expects to gain by going to trial is more than the cost of setting out of court. B. The company should settle out of couit, since the amount it expects to lose by going to trial is more than the cost of setting out of court. C. The company should allow the case to go to trial, since the amount it expects to gain by going to trial is more than the cost of setting out of court. D. The company should allow the case to go to trial, since the amount it expects to lose by going to trial is less than the cost of setting out of court.
Upstudy AI Solution
Answer
Solution

Sign in to Unlock Answers for Free!
A Learning Platform Trusted by Millions of Real Students and Teachers.

Answered by UpStudy AI and reviewed by a Professional Tutor
Mind Expander
It’s all about crunching those numbers! The expected loss if the company goes to trial can be calculated using the formula: \(E = (probability\ of\ guilty) \times (loss\ if\ guilty) + (probability\ of\ not\ guilty) \times (loss\ if\ not\ guilty)\). So, \(E = (0.2 \times 1200000) + (0.8 \times 0) = 240000\). This means heading to trial could cost the company an estimated \( \$ 240,000\). Now, when deciding whether to settle or go to trial, we're comparing that expected loss of \( \$240,000\) against the \( \$350,000\) settlement offer. Since the expected financial outcome of going to trial is lower (\$240,000) than settling (\$350,000), the company should definitely settle out of court. That makes option B the right choice!