How does the allusion to the Boston Tea Party reinforce King's argument about civil disobedience? By citing an example of civil disobedience by everyday people, King shows that civil disobedience can be necessary and productive. By using an example of civil disobedience that took place in the past, King shows that civil disobedience is no longer necessary. By using an example of civil disobedience that took place in the North, King shows that the Southerr states have not used civil disobedience effectively. By using an example of a "massive act of civil disobedience," King shows that the demonstrations in Alabama are not as large and disruptive as his critics think. DONE

The Boston Tea Party, a pivotal moment in American history, was a bold act of civil disobedience against oppressive taxation by the British government. King cleverly references this event to demonstrate how individuals can challenge unjust laws, highlighting that resistance can spark significant change. This historic protest exemplifies that collective action, even when it disrupts the status quo, can rally support for social justice and civil rights. In King's argument, he effectively aligns the spirit of the Boston Tea Party with the struggles faced by African Americans, suggesting that civil disobedience should be seen not just as a right, but as a moral responsibility. Just as the American colonists took a stand for their rights, King urges people to recognize the urgency of standing against racial injustice through nonviolent protests, underscoring that such actions can be both necessary and transformative in the pursuit of equality.