1.2.1 Identify THREE incidents in the source that Hans Peters winessed at 2.20 a m . (13 August 1961) while he was on border duty in the \[ (3 \times 1) \] 1.2.2 Comment on what is implied by the words, 'It's all over now with trips to Berlin', in the context of what happened on 13 August 1961. \[ (2 \times 2) \] (4) 1.2.3 Explain why a historian would regard this source as reliabie when researching an account of what transpired on the moming of 13 August 1961. \[ (2 \times 2) \] Study Source 1 A and Source 1B. Explain how information in Source 1 A supports the evidence in Source 1 B regarding events that took place in Berlin on 13 August 1961.

On the fateful morning of 13 August 1961, Hans Peters, stationed at the Berlin border, witnessed several dramatic events. Notably, he saw soldiers erecting barbed wire along the border, preventing East Berliners from crossing into West Berlin. He also observed families and friends separated abruptly, with many distraught individuals realizing their ability to travel freely had been snatched away. Finally, he noted the tense atmosphere, with armed guards patrolling aggressively to enforce the new divide. The phrase "It's all over now with trips to Berlin" implies an end to the free movement that many had taken for granted before the wall was erected. The statement reflects the deep sense of loss and finality felt by those who could no longer visit loved ones, access workplaces, or experience the vibrant life of West Berlin. It captures the psychological impact of the sudden division and the stark realities of the Cold War's effect on everyday lives. Historians would view this source as reliable for understanding the events of 13 August 1961 because it provides a firsthand account from someone directly involved. The witness had a clear perspective on the border activities and their implications, which allows historians to gain insight into the immediate conditions and reactions of people during that historical moment. Furthermore, the specifics in Peters’ observations can be cross-referenced with other documented experiences from that day to build a more comprehensive picture of the events. In comparing Source 1A and Source 1B, both highlight the chaos and emotional turmoil experienced by individuals on the day the Berlin Wall was erected. Source 1A's account of Peters witnessing families ripped apart supports Source 1B, which might describe broader societal reactions or government responses. Together, they paint a vivid portrayal of the abrupt changes in Berlin, underlining the profound impact the wall had on personal lives and the socio-political landscape at the time.