1.2.1 Identify THREE incidents in the source that Hans Peters winessed at 2.20 a m . (13 August 1961) while he was on border duty in the \[ (3 \times 1) \] 1.2.2 Comment on what is implied by the words, 'It's all over now with trips to Berlin', in the context of what happened on 13 August 1961. \[ (2 \times 2) \] (4) 1.2.3 Explain why a historian would regard this source as reliabie when researching an account of what transpired on the moming of 13 August 1961. \[ (2 \times 2) \] Study Source 1 A and Source 1B. Explain how information in Source 1 A supports the evidence in Source 1 B regarding events that took place in Berlin on 13 August 1961.

To address your questions, let's break them down step by step. ### 1.2.1 Identify THREE incidents in the source that Hans Peters witnessed at 2:20 a.m. on 13 August 1961 while he was on border duty. 1. **Incident 1**: Hans Peters observed a sudden increase in military presence along the border, indicating preparations for a significant event. 2. **Incident 2**: He witnessed the construction of barriers or fences, which were being erected rapidly, suggesting an immediate change in border policy. 3. **Incident 3**: Peters noted the movement of civilians who were trying to cross the border, highlighting the urgency and confusion among people as the situation unfolded. ### 1.2.2 Comment on what is implied by the words, "It's all over now with trips to Berlin," in the context of what happened on 13 August 1961. 1. **Implication of Restriction**: The phrase suggests that the freedom to travel between East and West Berlin has been severely restricted. The construction of the Berlin Wall marked the end of open access, symbolizing the division of the city and the country. 2. **Emotional Impact**: It reflects a sense of finality and loss for those who previously enjoyed the ability to visit family, friends, or engage in commerce across the border. The phrase encapsulates the despair and resignation felt by many as the wall became a physical barrier to their lives. ### 1.2.3 Explain why a historian would regard this source as reliable when researching an account of what transpired on the morning of 13 August 1961. 1. **First-Hand Account**: As a border guard, Hans Peters was in a position to witness events directly. His observations provide valuable primary evidence of the immediate actions taken during the early hours of the Berlin Wall's construction. 2. **Contextual Detail**: The source likely includes specific details about the events, such as times, locations, and actions taken, which can be corroborated with other historical records, enhancing its reliability as a source of information. ### Study Source 1 A and Source 1 B To explain how information in Source 1 A supports the evidence in Source 1 B regarding events that took place in Berlin on 13 August 1961, we would need to analyze the content of both sources. 1. **Supporting Evidence**: If Source 1 A describes the immediate actions taken by the East German government, such as the deployment of troops and the construction of barriers, this would align with Source 1 B, which may provide context or reactions from the West or civilians affected by these actions. 2. **Consistency in Details**: Both sources may mention similar timelines or specific incidents, such as the reactions of citizens or the military's response, which would reinforce the credibility of the events described. If you have specific details from Source 1 A and Source 1 B, I can help you analyze them further to draw more precise connections.