13. In this document, Andrew Jackson is depicted as king. Identify and explain one action or decision made by Jackson that would lead his critics to compare him to a king.

One action taken by Andrew Jackson that led his critics to compare him to a king was his use of the veto power. Specifically, Jackson vetoed the recharter of the Second Bank of the United States in 1832, which was a significant move that demonstrated his willingness to challenge established institutions and authority. ### Explanation: 1. **Context of the Veto**: The Second Bank of the United States was a powerful institution that played a crucial role in the nation's economy. Many viewed it as a stabilizing force, while Jackson and his supporters saw it as a symbol of elite privilege and corruption. 2. **Jackson's Decision**: In July 1832, Jackson vetoed the bill to recharter the bank, arguing that it was unconstitutional and detrimental to the common people. He believed that the bank favored the wealthy and was not accountable to the public. 3. **Critics' Perspective**: Critics of Jackson viewed this action as an overreach of executive power. By vetoing the bank's recharter, Jackson acted unilaterally, which some perceived as a king-like exercise of authority. They argued that he was disregarding the will of Congress and the established political process, similar to how a monarch might impose their will without regard for legislative authority. 4. **Impact on Democracy**: Jackson's critics feared that his actions set a precedent for future presidents to wield excessive power, undermining the checks and balances that are fundamental to a democratic system. This led to concerns that he was acting more like a king than a democratically elected leader. In summary, Jackson's veto of the Second Bank's recharter exemplified his assertive use of presidential power, prompting comparisons to a king and raising questions about the balance of power in the American political system.