COMPARE AND CONTRAST. What is the difference between cyberbullying and traditional bullying? Type your answer here...

Cyberbullying and traditional bullying share the common feature of causing emotional and psychological harm, but they differ significantly in how they are executed and experienced. • Medium and Accessibility:  – Traditional bullying typically occurs face-to-face in places like schools, neighborhoods, or other physical settings. In contrast, cyberbullying uses digital platforms such as social media, texts, emails, and online forums, making it accessible anytime and anywhere. • Anonymity and Identification:  – In traditional bullying, the perpetrators are usually identifiable, which means the bullied can sometimes recognize or confront the bully. Cyberbullying often allows the bully to hide their identity behind anonymous or fake profiles, making it harder for the victim to know who is responsible. • Reach and Audience:  – The audience in traditional bullying is generally limited to those present (such as classmates or bystanders), while cyberbullying can quickly reach a wide audience online, spreading harmful content far beyond the immediate environment. This expansive reach can amplify the victim’s distress. • Permanence of Harm:  – Incidents of traditional bullying are typically ephemeral; however, cyberbullying posts can be permanent online or repeatedly shared, making it difficult to escape the bullying even when it is removed from the original source. • Time and Space Constraints:  – Traditional bullying is often confined to specific times and locations (like school hours or lunchtime), whereas cyberbullying can occur at any time, including evenings and weekends, leaving the victim feeling constantly vulnerable. Overall, while both forms of bullying involve the deliberate infliction of harm, the key differences lie in the methods and challenges unique to the digital realm, such as anonymity, lasting digital footprints, and an ever-present risk due to the accessibility of technology.