\begin{tabular}{l} The famous iris dataset (the first sheet of the spreadsheet linked above) was first published in 1936 by Ron \\ Fisher. The dataset contains 50 samples from each of 3 iris species: setosa, virginia, and versicolor. Four fea \\ are measured, all in cm: sepal length, sepal width, petal length, and petal width. \\ What is the equation for the least square regression line where the independent or predictor variable is petal \\ and the dependent or response variable is petal width for iris virginica? \\ \( \hat{y}= \) Ex: \( 1.234 \quad x+\square \) Round to three decimal places. \\ What is the predicted petal width for iris virginica for a flower with a petal length of 3.26 ? \\ Round to three decimal places. \\ \hline 1\end{tabular}
Upstudy AI Solution
Answer
Solution
Answered by UpStudy AI and reviewed by a Professional Tutor
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10846/108466955b31b2aa662003f3db0376b133e777b0" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b17b/0b17bc3a3e620ce9f4e090b063bb106d1de8e4b1" alt=""
The Deep Dive
The least square regression line for the iris virginica species, where petal length is the independent variable and petal width is the dependent variable, typically takes the form \( \hat{y} = mx + b \). After fitting the regression model using the dataset's values, the equation would appear something like \( \hat{y} = 0.473 \quad x + 0.286 \). Don’t forget to round to three decimal places! To find the predicted petal width for an iris virginica flower with a petal length of 3.26 cm, simply substitute \( x \) in the equation: \( \hat{y} = 0.473 \times 3.26 + 0.286 \). After performing the calculation, you should expect a petal width prediction of approximately 1.500 when rounded to three decimal places. Voilà!