Question
Question 5 5 pts 5 Women in Rome were free and answered to no one. utton True 5 False Question 6 5 pts There was no such thing in Rome as "oral" law-what you promised with your mouth meant nothing-everything had to be in writing. True False
Ask by Graham Wood. in the United States
Mar 10,2025
Upstudy AI Solution
Tutor-Verified Answer
Answer
**Question 5:**
False
Women in ancient Rome were not completely independent and were generally under the authority of a male head of household.
**Question 6:**
False
Rome had both written and oral laws, and verbal agreements could have legal standing in certain situations.
Solution
**Question 5**
1. The statement is:
\( \text{"Women in Rome were free and answered to no one."} \)
2. In ancient Rome, although women were not slaves and had certain legal rights, they were generally under the authority of a male head of household—first their father and later their husband.
3. This means that, in terms of legal and social power, women were not completely independent.
4. **Answer:** False
---
**Question 6**
1. The statement is:
\( \text{"There was no such thing in Rome as 'oral' law—what you promised with your mouth meant nothing—everything had to be in writing."} \)
2. In Roman law, while there were important written statutes such as the Law of the Twelve Tables, oral agreements and customary practices also played a significant role in legal transactions and contracts.
3. Promises and verbal agreements could have legal standing under certain circumstances.
4. **Answer:** False
Answered by UpStudy AI and reviewed by a Professional Tutor
Like
error msg
Explain 
Simplify this solution Bonus Knowledge
While women in ancient Rome had more rights than in many other societies of the time, they were still largely under the authority of their fathers or husbands, particularly in terms of property and social status. They could own property and run businesses, but their ultimate freedoms were limited and often subject to male guardianship. In the context of Roman law, verbal agreements did hold significance, but they had to be corroborated with written evidence—especially for significant matters. The reliance on written contracts helped establish clarity and accountability in legal transactions, serving to protect all parties involved.
