Is the correlation most likely due to coincidence, a common underlying cause, or a direct cause? A. The correlation is most likely due to a direct cause. As students study more, they gain a better understanding of the subject and their test scores are likely to be lower. B. The correlation is most likely due to a common underlying cause. As students study more, they gain a better understanding of the subject and their test scores are likely to be higher. C. The correlation is most likely due to a direct cause. As students study more, they gain a better understanding of the subject and their test scores are likely to be higher. D. The correlation is most likely due to a coincidence. As students study more, they gain a better understanding of the subject and their test scores are likely to be higher.
Upstudy AI Solution
Answer
Solution
Answered by UpStudy AI and reviewed by a Professional Tutor


The Deep Dive
Think of it this way: countless studies have shown that when students invest more time in studying, they indeed grasp the material better and generally perform well on tests. It's like watering a plant; more care leads to more growth. So that points us to answer C — as students study more, their understanding of the subject increases, resulting in higher test scores! However, the world is full of intriguing relationships! Just remember that correlation does not imply causation. It’s easy to fall into the trap of assuming that because two things happen together, one must be causing the other. Sometimes, external factors — like a fantastic teacher or access to resources — might be boosting both study time and test scores. Always investigate the full picture before jumping to conclusions.