Incorrect. If a rock sample was found to contain \( 3.14 \times 10^{-7} \mathrm{~mol} \) of argon- 40 , how much potassium \( -40\left(\mathrm{t}_{1 / 2}=1.3 \times 10^{9}\right. \) yr) would also have to be present for the rock to be \( 1.3 \times 10^{9} \) years old? eTextbook and Media Hint
Upstudy AI Solution
Answer
Solution
Answered by UpStudy AI and reviewed by a Professional Tutor
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10846/108466955b31b2aa662003f3db0376b133e777b0" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b17b/0b17bc3a3e620ce9f4e090b063bb106d1de8e4b1" alt=""
Extra Insights
The relationship between potassium-40 and argon-40 is essential for dating rocks. For every 1 mole of potassium-40 that decays, it produces 1 mole of argon-40. Since the half-life of potassium-40 is 1.3 billion years, the amount of potassium-40 present when the rock was formed can be calculated using the formula for half-life. Considering that your rock is 1.3 billion years old and currently has \( 3.14 \times 10^{-7} \) mol of argon-40, you would actually need 2 times that amount of potassium-40 at the beginning, which equals \( 6.28 \times 10^{-7} \) mol. To solve this problem effectively, it can be beneficial to understand that the amount of the original potassium-40 can be determined by noting that the ratio of the remaining substance to the substance produced is linked through the equation of exponential decay. A common mistake here is failing to double the amount of the current argon-40 because the decay means some potassium-40 has transformed into argon-40! So, always remember - for each mole of argon produced, an equal amount of potassium has decayed. Happy calculating!