Question
upstudy study bank question image url

6. Consider the rational function: \( f(x)=\frac{x+3}{x^{2}-16} \) a) Determine the Vertical Asymptotes. \[ \frac{x+3}{(x-4)(x+4)} \] b) Determine the Horizontal Asymptotes (if there are none, state "N/A"). c) Determine the Oblique Asymptotes (If there are none, state " \( N / A^{\text {" }} \) ). d) Find the \( x \)-intercept(s). e) Find the \( y \)-intercept. 7. Solve the inequality \( 2 x^{3}-x^{2}<18 x-9 \).

Ask by Bond Fitzgerald. in the United States
Mar 13,2025

Upstudy AI Solution

Tutor-Verified Answer

Answer

- **Vertical Asymptotes:** \( x = -4 \) and \( x = 4 \) - **Horizontal Asymptote:** \( y = 0 \) - **Oblique Asymptote:** None - **\( x \)-intercept:** \( x = -3 \) - **\( y \)-intercept:** \( y = -\frac{3}{16} \) **Inequality Solution:** \( x < -3 \) or \( \frac{1}{2} < x < 3 \)

Solution

Sign in to Unlock Answers for Free!

A Learning Platform Trusted by Millions of Real Students and Teachers.

star-icon Unlock

Answered by UpStudy AI and reviewed by a Professional Tutor

Extra Insights

To determine the vertical asymptotes of the function \( f(x) = \frac{x+3}{x^2 - 16} \), set the denominator equal to zero: \( x^2 - 16 = 0 \). This transforms into \( (x-4)(x+4) = 0 \), giving you vertical asymptotes at \( x = 4 \) and \( x = -4 \). Next, for the horizontal asymptotes, since the degree of the numerator (1) is less than the degree of the denominator (2), you have a horizontal asymptote at \( y = 0 \). For oblique asymptotes, they only occur if the degree of the numerator is exactly one more than that of the denominator, which is not the case here; thus, it's \( N / A^{\text{"}} \). The \( x \)-intercepts can be found by setting the numerator equal to zero: \( x + 3 = 0 \), leading to the \( x \)-intercept at \( x = -3 \). For the \( y \)-intercept, plug in \( x = 0 \) into the function, giving \( y = \frac{0 + 3}{0^2 - 16} = -\frac{3}{16} \). Now for the inequality \( 2x^{3}-x^{2}<18x-9 \): rearranging it, we have \( 2x^{3}-x^{2}-18x+9 < 0 \). Factoring this cubic can be tricky, but using the Rational Root Theorem might lead you to test integer roots. You can proceed with potential solutions from the factors of 9 (like \( x = 1, -1, 3, -3 \) etc.). Once you find the roots, you can test intervals to determine where the resulting polynomial is less than zero. And there you go! You’ve tackled a rational function with all its intricacies and solved a cubic inequality. So, keep crunching those numbers!

Related Questions

Try Premium now!
Try Premium and ask Thoth AI unlimited math questions now!
Maybe later Go Premium
Study can be a real struggle
Why not UpStudy it?
Select your plan below
Premium

You can enjoy

Start now
  • Step-by-step explanations
  • 24/7 expert live tutors
  • Unlimited number of questions
  • No interruptions
  • Full access to Answer and Solution
  • Full Access to PDF Chat, UpStudy Chat, Browsing Chat
Basic

Totally free but limited

  • Limited Solution
Welcome to UpStudy!
Please sign in to continue the Thoth AI Chat journey
Continue with Email
Or continue with
By clicking “Sign in”, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy