Answer
**a. Inequality and Constraints**
The café needs to sell \( p \) peach smoothies and \( b \) berry smoothies to make a profit of more than \$90. The inequality is:
\[
2.25p + 2b > 90
\]
**Constraints:**
- \( p \ge 0 \) (cannot sell a negative number of peach smoothies)
- \( b \ge 0 \) (cannot sell a negative number of berry smoothies)
**b. Graphing the Inequality**
1. **Boundary Line:**
\[
2.25p + 2b = 90
\]
- When \( p = 0 \): \( b = 45 \) → Point \((0, 45)\)
- When \( b = 0 \): \( p = 40 \) → Point \((40, 0)\)
2. **Graph:**
- Plot points \((0, 45)\) and \((40, 0)\).
- Draw a dashed line connecting them.
- Shade the region above the line, as it represents the inequality \( 2.25p + 2b > 90 \).
**c. Number of Berry Smoothies Sold on Monday**
Given \( p = 20 \):
\[
2.25(20) + 2b > 90 \quad \Rightarrow \quad 45 + 2b > 90 \quad \Rightarrow \quad 2b > 45 \quad \Rightarrow \quad b > 22.5
\]
Since the number of smoothies must be whole, the café sold at least 23 berry smoothies on Monday.
**Summary:**
- **(a)** Inequality: \( 2.25p + 2b > 90 \) with \( p \ge 0 \) and \( b \ge 0 \)
- **(b)** Graph: Shaded region above the dashed line \( 2.25p + 2b = 90 \)
- **(c)** At least 23 berry smoothies were sold on Monday
Solution
**a. Setting Up the Inequality**
The profit from selling \( p \) peach smoothies is \( \$2.25 \) each, contributing a total of \( 2.25p \) dollars to the profit. The profit from selling \( b \) berry smoothies is \( \$2 \) each, contributing \( 2b \) dollars. The café’s daily profit must be more than \( \$90 \), so the inequality is
\[
2.25p + 2b > 90.
\]
Since it is not possible to sell a negative number of smoothies, we have the constraints
\[
p \ge 0 \quad \text{and} \quad b \ge 0.
\]
---
**b. Graphing the Inequality**
1. **Identify the Boundary Line:**
The boundary line of the inequality is found by replacing the \( > \) sign with \( = \):
\[
2.25p + 2b = 90.
\]
2. **Find the Intercepts of the Boundary Line:**
- When \( p = 0 \):
\[
2b = 90 \quad \Longrightarrow \quad b = 45.
\]
This gives the point \((0, 45)\).
- When \( b = 0 \):
\[
2.25p = 90 \quad \Longrightarrow \quad p = \frac{90}{2.25} = 40.
\]
This gives the point \((40, 0)\).
3. **Sketch the Graph:**
- Plot the points \((0, 45)\) and \((40, 0)\) on the coordinate plane.
- Draw the dashed line connecting these two points, indicating that points on the line are not included in the solution (because the inequality is strict, \(>\)).
- Shade the region above the line, since testing a point (for instance, \((20, 23)\)) shows:
\[
2.25(20) + 2(23) = 45 + 46 = 91 > 90.
\]
Thus, the shaded region is the set of all points \((p, b)\) where the inequality holds. Remember that \( p \) and \( b \) are only meaningful for non-negative values.
---
**c. Determining the Number of Berry Smoothies Sold on Monday**
On Monday, the café sold \( 20 \) peach smoothies. Substitute \( p = 20 \) into the inequality:
\[
2.25(20) + 2b > 90.
\]
Calculate the profit from peach smoothies:
\[
2.25(20) = 45.
\]
Thus, the inequality becomes:
\[
45 + 2b > 90.
\]
Subtract \( 45 \) from both sides:
\[
2b > 45.
\]
Divide both sides by \( 2 \):
\[
b > 22.5.
\]
Since the number of smoothies must be a whole number, the café must have sold at least \( 23 \) berry smoothies.
---
\[
\textbf{Summary of Answers:}
\]
- **(a)** The inequality is
\[
2.25p + 2b > 90 \quad \text{with} \quad p \ge 0 \quad \text{and} \quad b \ge 0.
\]
- **(b)** The boundary line \(2.25p + 2b = 90\) has intercepts \((0, 45)\) and \((40, 0)\); the solution is the region above this dashed line.
- **(c)** The café must have sold at least \( 23 \) berry smoothies on Monday.
Answered by UpStudy AI and reviewed by a Professional Tutor

Explain

Simplify this solution