4)) Which headline best avoids biased language? Animals on Endangered Species List Get Assistance from Zookeepers Zookeepers' Focus on Endangered Species Harms Other Animals Zoo Professionals Demonstrate Competence, Help Endangered Species Submit

1. **Analyze Each Headline** - **Headline 1:** "Animals on Endangered Species List Get Assistance from Zookeepers" This headline states a factual relationship without using emotionally charged language. - **Headline 2:** "Zookeepers' Focus on Endangered Species Harms Other Animals" This headline includes a negative evaluation by using the word \( \text{harms} \), which suggests bias against zookeepers. - **Headline 3:** "Zoo Professionals Demonstrate Competence, Help Endangered Species" Although positive, this headline uses evaluative language (\( \text{demonstrate competence} \)) that can be seen as an endorsement rather than neutral reporting. 2. **Determine Which Headline Best Avoids Biased Language** A headline aiming for neutrality should stick to objective facts without inserting evaluations or opinions. - **Headline 1** simply describes what is happening: animals on the endangered list are receiving assistance. - **Headline 2** inserts a negative value judgment. - **Headline 3** inserts a positive evaluation which, while favorable, is not entirely objective. 3. **Conclusion** The headline that best avoids biased language is: \( \textbf{Animals on Endangered Species List Get Assistance from Zookeepers} \)