\( 1 \leftarrow \begin{array}{l}\text { For the description below, state the correlation clearly. (For example, state that "there is a positive correlation between } \\ \text { variable A and variable B.") Then state whether the correlation is most likely due to coincidence, a common } \\ \text { underlying cause, or a direct cause. Explain your answer. } \\ \text { Statistics students find that as they spend more time studying, their test scores are higher. } \\ \text { What is the correlation? } \\ \text { A. There is positive correlation between the number of hours spent studying and their test scores. } \\ \text { B. There is strong negative correlation between the number of hours spent studying and their test scores. } \\ \text { C. There is weak negative correlation between the number of hours spent studying and their test scores. } \\ \text { D. There is no correlation between the number of hours spent studying and their test scores. }\end{array} . \begin{array}{l}\text {. }\end{array} \).
Solución de inteligencia artificial de Upstudy
Responder
Solución
Respondido por UpStudy AI y revisado por un tutor profesional


Beyond the Answer
There is a positive correlation between the number of hours spent studying and their test scores. This means that as students invest more time in their studies, their scores tend to improve in a consistent manner. This correlation is most likely due to a direct cause, as increased study time generally leads to better understanding of the material, which translates to higher performance on exams. To further illustrate this, consider how cramming an hour a night before a test might create a shaky foundation of knowledge, while steady, consistent studying allows for better retention and understanding over time. So, the moral of the story? Scheduling those study sessions can lead to success!
