Pregunta
Question #3 of 23
Tenant Teresa and landlord Lester enter into a written contract for Teresa to rent Lester’s commercial property. Teresa starts out selling cigars and cigarettes but goes
health kick and decides to change it into a cross-training studio without notifying Lester. Can Lester sue Terri for breach of contract?
A) No, if there is no limitation on use of the premises
B) Yes, because the contract is not subject to the statute of frauds.
C) No, as long as Teresa does not alter the property
D) Yes, because Teresa is violating the terms of use in the contract.
Tenant Teresa and landlord Lester enter into a written contract for Teresa to rent Lester’s commercial property. Teresa starts out selling cigars and cigarettes but goes
health kick and decides to change it into a cross-training studio without notifying Lester. Can Lester sue Terri for breach of contract?
A) No, if there is no limitation on use of the premises
B) Yes, because the contract is not subject to the statute of frauds.
C) No, as long as Teresa does not alter the property
D) Yes, because Teresa is violating the terms of use in the contract.
Ask by Powell Pritchard. in the United States
Mar 24,2025
Solución de inteligencia artificial de Upstudy
Respuesta verificada por el tutor
Responder
Lester can sue Teresa because she changed the business without permission, which violates the contract terms.
Solución
- Teresa and Lester sign a written commercial lease agreement that includes the permitted use of the property.
- Teresa originally intended to sell cigars and cigarettes, which was acceptable under the contract.
- By changing the business to a cross-training studio without notifying Lester, Teresa is altering the property’s use from what was agreed upon.
- A written lease typically contains specific terms regarding the allowed use of the premises, and unauthorized changes can constitute a breach of contract.
- Therefore, Lester would have grounds to sue Teresa for breach of contract because she is violating the terms of use set forth in their agreement.
The correct answer is:
D) Yes, because Teresa is violating the terms of use in the contract.
D) Yes, because Teresa is violating the terms of use in the contract.
Respondido por UpStudy AI y revisado por un tutor profesional
Como
error msg
Explicar 
Simplifique esta solución The Deep Dive
The situation at hand typically revolves around the specific terms in the lease agreement that Teresa signed with Lester. If the contract includes a clause that restricts the use of the property to selling tobacco products, then changing to a cross-training studio could indeed be considered a breach of contract. In general, landlords and tenants need to be crystal clear about allowable uses of the premises to avoid disputes down the line.
In the world of commercial leases, it’s common for landlords to maintain control over what types of businesses can operate on their property. This means that if Lester specifically outlined the permitted use of the premises in their contract, then Teresa’s decision to switch to a completely different business without notifying Lester could lead to significant legal repercussions, potentially allowing Lester to initiate a lawsuit against her for breach of contract. Always read those fine print clauses!
¡Prueba Premium ahora!
¡Prueba Premium y hazle a Thoth AI preguntas de matemáticas ilimitadas ahora!
Quizas mas tarde
Hazte Premium
