A scientist estimates that the mean nitrogen dioxide level in a city is greater than 27 parts per billion. To test this estimate, you determine the nitrogen dioxide \( \quad \begin{array}{lllllllllllllllllll}41 & 20 & 33 & 14 & 14 & 42 & 43 & 16 & 30 & 38 & 26\end{array} \) levels for 31 randomly selected days. The results (in parts per billion) are listed \( \quad 2836334035142439161738 \) to the nght Assume that the population standard deviation is 7. At \( \boldsymbol{\alpha}=0.07 \), can 151622313034424138 you support the scientist's estimate? Complete parts (a) through (e). (a) Wite the claim mathematically and identify \( \mathrm{H}_{0} \) and \( \mathrm{H}_{\mathrm{a}} \). Choose from the following. A. \( \mathrm{H}_{0} \cdot \mu \leq 27 \) (claim) B. \( \mathrm{H}_{0}: \mu=27 \) \( \mathrm{H}_{\mathrm{a}} \cdot \mu>27 \) \( \mathrm{H}_{\mathrm{a}}: \mu>27 \) (claim) c. \( \mathrm{H}_{0}: \mu \leq 27 \) D. \( \mathrm{H}_{0} \cdot \mu \geq 27 \) (claim) E. \( H_{0}: \mu<27 \) \( H_{a}: \mu<27 \) \( \mathrm{H}_{\mathrm{a}} \cdot \mu \geq 27 \) (claim) F. \( \mathrm{H}_{0}: \mu=27 \) (claim) \( \mathrm{H}_{\mathrm{a}}: \mu>27 \) (b) Find the critical value and identify the rejection region. \( z_{0}=1.48 \) (Round to two decimal places as needed.) Rejection region \( z \) 1.48 (C) Find the standardiced lest statistic. \[ z=\square \text { (Round to two decimal places as needed) } \]
Solución de inteligencia artificial de Upstudy
Responder
Solución
Respondido por UpStudy AI y revisado por un tutor profesional
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10846/108466955b31b2aa662003f3db0376b133e777b0" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b17b/0b17bc3a3e620ce9f4e090b063bb106d1de8e4b1" alt=""
Mind Expander
To gauge how to support the scientist’s claim, let's dive into some historical context. Hypothesis testing, especially z-tests for means, gained prominence during the 20th century. The process allows researchers to rigorously evaluate claims about populations using sample data, significantly enhancing the decision-making process in science and statistics. The groundwork laid by statisticians like Ronald Fisher helped standardize testing methods, enabling diverse applications across fields including environmental science—like in your nitrogen dioxide analysis! Now let's sprinkle some real-world application fun! Imagine you're an environmental scientist responsible for air quality management. The readings you're analyzing can influence local policy and community health initiatives. If your test supports the hypothesis that nitrogen dioxide levels are indeed exceeding the threshold, it could lead to stricter regulations on emissions, more funding for air quality monitoring, or even public campaigns to raise awareness. Your findings hold the power to improve air quality and community health!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a6b0/4a6b09f9aefbc871618deaaae5ef0bbe0a6b610e" alt=""