Let \( N=\{1,2,3,4, \ldots\} \) be the set of natural numbers and \( S=\{1,4,9,16, \ldots\} \) be the set of squares of the natural numbers. Then \( N-S \), since we have the one-to-one correspondence \( 1 \leftrightarrow 1,2 \leftrightarrow 4,3 \leftrightarrow 9,4 \leftrightarrow 16, \ldots, n \leftrightarrow n^{2} \). (This example is interesting, since it shows that an infinite set can be equivalent to a proper subset of itself.) Show that each of the following pairs of sets are equivalent by carefully describing a one-fo-one correspondence between the sets. Complete parts (a) through (c) below. (a) The whole numbers and natural numbers, \( W=\{0,1,2,3, \ldots\} \) and \( N=\{1,2,3,4, \ldots\} \) Which of the following describes a one-to-one correspondence between the two sets? A. For each element in \( W \), there is an element in \( N \) that is double that element. B. For each element in W , there is an element in N that is 2 greater than that element. C. For each element in \( \mathbf{W} \), there is an element in N that is 1 greater than that element. D. For each element in W , there is an element in N that is 1 greater than double that element. Write a general rule for the correspondence described in the previous step using w as an element in W. \( \square \)
Solución de inteligencia artificial de Upstudy
Responder
Solución

¡Inicia sesión para desbloquear respuestas gratis!
Una plataforma de aprendizaje en la que confían millones de estudiantes y profesores reales.

Respondido por UpStudy AI y revisado por un tutor profesional
The Deep Dive
To establish a one-to-one correspondence between the whole numbers \( W \) and the natural numbers \( N \), we can consider the relationship described by option C. Each whole number \( w \) maps to a natural number \( n \) such that \( n = w + 1 \). So, for \( w = 0 \), \( n = 1 \); for \( w = 1 \), \( n = 2 \); and so on. This simple linear relationship ensures that for every \( w \) in \( W \), there is a unique corresponding \( n \) in \( N \), making it a perfect pair! Now, the general rule for our correspondence can be stated as: if \( w \) is an element in \( W \), then its corresponding element in \( N \) is given by \( n = w + 1 \).
