When may the government impose limitations * on freedom of speech? When they feel like people are upset with the government. To prevent hoarding of essential items. When speech poses a direct threat to public safety. When speech is not inline with the president.

1. **Interpret the question:** The question asks when the government may impose limitations on freedom of speech. 2. **Analyze the given options:** - Option 1: When they feel like people are upset with the government. This rationale is arbitrary and subjective without a basis in law. - Option 2: To prevent hoarding of essential items. This relates to economic regulation or public order measures, not freedom of speech. - Option 3: When speech poses a direct threat to public safety. This is consistent with legal principles that allow limitations on speech if it leads to imminent harm or public danger. - Option 4: When speech is not inline with the president. This is a politically biased criterion and not a recognized legal justification. 3. **Determine the correct option:** The only legally sound justification is stated in Option 3, where the government may limit speech if it poses a direct threat to public safety. This is in line with restrictions placed on speech that incites violence or harm. 4. **Final Answer:** The government may impose limitations on freedom of speech when **speech poses a direct threat to public safety**.