2. At the Constitutional Convention in 1787 , the delegates couldn't agree on how much \[ \text { President should wield } \]
Solución de inteligencia artificial de Upstudy
Responder
Solución
Respondido por UpStudy AI y revisado por un tutor profesional
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10846/108466955b31b2aa662003f3db0376b133e777b0" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b17b/0b17bc3a3e620ce9f4e090b063bb106d1de8e4b1" alt=""
Bonus Knowledge
The debate about presidential power during the Constitutional Convention was intense! Some delegates, like Alexander Hamilton, argued for a strong executive to ensure effective governance, while others, like Thomas Jefferson, feared that too much power could lead to tyranny. In the end, they compromised by establishing a system of checks and balances, allowing the presidency to hold significant authority while keeping it in check through Congress and the judiciary. Fast forward to today, and that balance of power is still at the heart of American politics! The ongoing discussions about executive power can be seen in various forms—from presidential vetoes to executive orders. These tools have allowed presidents to shape policy while sparking debates on their limits, reflecting the same concerns that the Founding Fathers had over two centuries ago.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a6b0/4a6b09f9aefbc871618deaaae5ef0bbe0a6b610e" alt=""