Although it is a much-anticipated tradition for students across the United States, the time has come to do away with ummer vacation. After taking months off from school, students must spend the first several weeks of the next year simply elearning what they forgot over the summer. It would be far better to have school throughout the year with shorter breaks very few months. What would strengthen the argument? (1) providing evidence that having school year-round improves student achievement (2) showing proof that students would be willing to give up summer vacation 3) offering a reasonable alternative to having a long summer vacation each year

One way to strengthen the argument is to highlight studies that have consistently shown that year-round schooling can lead to improved academic performance. Research has indicated that continuous engagement in learning helps students retain knowledge and skills, reducing the "summer slide" phenomenon where students forget information when out of school for extended periods. This evidence not only supports the argument but also paints a picture of a more effective learning environment. Another fun angle to consider is how students might actually enjoy a new school schedule. Incorporating shorter, more frequent breaks rather than a long summer might mean fewer months of endless boredom or feeling unmotivated. These breaks could be creatively themed or tied to local events, giving students something to look forward to while still maintaining their learning momentum. Who wouldn’t want a school calendar designed around adventures and mini-holidays?