Which situation is an example of double jeopardy? * A person is put on trial without a lawyer and found guilty. A person is found guilty after a trial and convicted of multiple crimes. A person is found guilty after a trial and receives an unreasonable sentence. A person is put on trial and found guilty of a crime for which he or she has already been tried.

The concept of **double jeopardy** refers to the legal principle that prevents an individual from being tried twice for the same offense after either an acquittal or a conviction. This principle is enshrined in the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which states that no person "shall be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb." Let's analyze each option: 1. **A person is put on trial without a lawyer and found guilty.** - This scenario relates to the right to legal representation, not double jeopardy. 2. **A person is found guilty after a trial and convicted of multiple crimes.** - Being convicted of multiple crimes from a single act is permissible and does not constitute double jeopardy, as long as each charge is distinct. 3. **A person is found guilty after a trial and receives an unreasonable sentence.** - This pertains to sentencing issues, such as potentially violating the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment, but it does not relate to double jeopardy. 4. **A person is put on trial and found guilty of a crime for which he or she has already been tried.** - This is a clear example of double jeopardy. Once a person has been tried and either convicted or acquitted for a specific offense, they cannot be tried again for the same offense. **Therefore, the correct answer is:** **A person is put on trial and found guilty of a crime for which he or she has already been tried.**