\begin{tabular}{l} Roman law stipulated that a road should be eight feet wide \\ on a straight stretch. \\ \hline O True \\ O False \\ Question 8 \\ A person who broke the bone of a Roman freeman was \\ required to pay the same amount in reparations as he would \\ if he had broken the bone of a slave. \\ \( \begin{array}{l}\text { O True } \\ \text { O False }\end{array} \)\end{tabular}

To address the statements regarding Roman law, let's analyze each one separately. 1. **Statement about the road width:** - The statement claims that Roman law stipulated that a road should be eight feet wide on a straight stretch. - Historically, Roman roads were known for their engineering and construction standards, but the specific width can vary based on different sources and interpretations of Roman law. However, it is generally accepted that Roman roads were designed to be wide enough for two carts to pass each other, which could be around 8 feet or more in some cases. **Conclusion:** This statement is likely **True**. 2. **Statement about reparations for breaking bones:** - The second statement claims that a person who broke the bone of a Roman freeman was required to pay the same amount in reparations as he would if he had broken the bone of a slave. - In Roman law, there was a distinction between the legal status of freemen and slaves. Freemen had more rights and protections under the law, and the reparations for harming a freeman would typically be higher than for a slave, as slaves were considered property. **Conclusion:** This statement is **False**. ### Final Answers: 1. True 2. False