Rank utilitarianism, liberal contractarianism, and libertarianism in sequence from the political philosophy that would redistribute income the greatest to the one that would redistribute income the least. a. Utilitarianism, liberal contractarianism, libertarianism b. Libertarianism, liberal contractarianism, utilitarianism c. Liberal contractarianism, libertarianism, utilitarianism d. Liberal contractarianism, utilitarianism, libertarianism e. All three political philosophies argue for similar degrees of income redistribution.

To rank the political philosophies of utilitarianism, liberal contractarianism, and libertarianism based on their approach to income redistribution, we need to understand the core principles of each philosophy: 1. **Utilitarianism**: This philosophy advocates for actions that maximize overall happiness or utility. In terms of income redistribution, utilitarianism would support redistributing income from the wealthy to the poor if it increases overall utility. Therefore, it tends to favor significant income redistribution. 2. **Liberal Contractarianism**: This philosophy is based on the idea of a social contract where individuals agree on principles of justice and fairness. While it may support some level of redistribution to ensure fairness and equality of opportunity, it does not advocate for as extensive redistribution as utilitarianism. The extent of redistribution can vary based on the agreed-upon principles in the social contract. 3. **Libertarianism**: This philosophy emphasizes individual freedom and property rights, advocating for minimal state intervention in personal and economic matters. Libertarians typically oppose income redistribution, arguing that individuals should keep what they earn without government interference. Therefore, it supports the least amount of income redistribution among the three philosophies. Based on this analysis, the ranking from the greatest to the least income redistribution is: **a. Utilitarianism, liberal contractarianism, libertarianism**.