Exo1: Let the series \( \sum h_{n} \) such as, \( \forall n \in \mathbb{N}, \forall x \in \mathbb{R}_{+} ; h_{n}(x)=(-1)^{n} \frac{n^{2}+x}{1} \) 1. Prove that que \( \sum h_{n} \) do not absolutely convergent at any point of \( \mathrm{R}+ \). 2. Prove that que \( \sum h_{n} \) converges uniformly on \( \mathrm{R}_{+} \) Voir : Asanalyse 1-2-3 Guelma.pdf exo1 page 372
Solución de inteligencia artificial de Upstudy
Responder
Solución
Respondido por UpStudy AI y revisado por un tutor profesional
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10846/108466955b31b2aa662003f3db0376b133e777b0" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b17b/0b17bc3a3e620ce9f4e090b063bb106d1de8e4b1" alt=""
The Deep Dive
To show that the series \( \sum h_n(x) \) does not converge absolutely at any point in \( \mathbb{R}_{+} \), consider the absolute term \( |h_n(x)| = n^2 + x \). The series of absolute terms is given by \( \sum |h_n(x)| = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} (n^2 + x) \). Since the series \( \sum n^2 \) diverges, it follows that \( \sum |h_n(x)| \) diverges for all \( x \in \mathbb{R}_{+} \), confirming that \( \sum h_n \) does not converge absolutely anywhere on \( \mathbb{R}_{+} \). For uniform convergence on \( \mathbb{R}_{+} \), we can utilize the Weierstrass M-test. Note that \( h_n(x) = (-1)^n (n^2 + x) \). Define \( M_n = n^2 + 1 \), which is independent of \( x \) and satisfies \( |h_n(x)| \leq M_n \). The series \( \sum M_n \) diverges because it includes the divergent series \( \sum n^2 \), yet since \( h_n(x) \) oscillates based on the sign of \( n \), the series \( \sum h_n(x) \) is alternating and converges uniformly by the alternating series test. Thus, \( \sum h_n(x) \) converges uniformly on \( \mathbb{R}_{+} \).
preguntas relacionadas
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a6b0/4a6b09f9aefbc871618deaaae5ef0bbe0a6b610e" alt=""