Pregunta
upstudy study bank question image url

Claim: I believe that social media is more harmful/helpful because I believe that social media is more Evidence \#1: Evidence \#2: Evidence \#3: Prothero, Arianna. "How Social Media May Benefit Teens' Mental Health." E Week, 16 Feb. 2024,www.edweek.org/leadership/how-social-media-may-b mental-health/2024/02. Accessed 24 Feb. 2025.|

Ask by Luna Bradley. in the United States
Feb 25,2025

Solución de inteligencia artificial de Upstudy

Respuesta verificada por el tutor

Responder

I believe that social media is more helpful because it connects teens with supportive communities, provides mental health resources, and offers creative outlets for self-expression.

Solución

Below is one way to structure your argument. Note that you can adjust whether you argue that social media is more harmful or more helpful—the outline below presents the “more helpful” perspective, using the Prothero (2024) article as an example for evidence. Feel free to modify the claim, evidence, or overall approach as needed. ────────────────────────────── Claim: I believe that social media is more helpful than harmful because it provides essential support networks, fosters mental health awareness, and encourages creative self-expression among teens. Evidence #1: According to Prothero (2024), social media platforms offer teens a way to connect with peers facing similar challenges. This connection can reduce isolation, create safe spaces for emotional sharing, and even lead to improved mental health outcomes. The article highlights real examples where online communities have helped teens seek advice and comfort during difficult times. Evidence #2: Multiple studies have shown that moderated social media communities can serve as valuable resources for mental health information and support. These platforms often bring together professionals, advocates, and peers who share coping strategies and mental health tools. This network effect can be particularly beneficial for young people who might not have access to traditional support systems. Evidence #3: Social media also provides creative outlets for self-expression, allowing teens to share art, writing, music, and personal stories. These expressions not only validate their experiences but can also contribute to emotional healing. The ability to present one’s authentic self often bolsters self-confidence and gives teens a sense of purpose. Citation Example: Prothero, Arianna. "How Social Media May Benefit Teens' Mental Health." EdWeek, 16 Feb. 2024, www.edweek.org/leadership/how-social-media-may-benefit-teens-mental-health/2024/02. Accessed 24 Feb. 2025. ────────────────────────────── Using this outline as a guide, you can elaborate by discussing each piece of evidence in more detail, providing additional sources if available, and addressing potential counterarguments (such as privacy concerns or cyberbullying). Adjust your writing to fit the specific requirements of your assignment or the audience you’re addressing.

Respondido por UpStudy AI y revisado por un tutor profesional

error msg
Explicar
Simplifique esta solución

Bonus Knowledge

Social media’s impact on mental health can be a double-edged sword. On one hand, platforms like Instagram and TikTok offer communities where teens can connect over common interests, potentially improving their sense of belonging. However, research has shown that constant comparison and unrealistic portrayals of life can also lead to anxiety and low self-esteem, creating a complex landscape for users’ emotional well-being. When discussing the benefits of social media, it’s important to consider how it can foster creativity and self-expression. For instance, many young people use these platforms to showcase their artistic talents, participate in trends, or advocate for social issues they are passionate about. This not only boosts their self-esteem but also aligns them with a global community of like-minded individuals who can offer support and inspiration.

preguntas relacionadas

What might happen if the Iducation Department were cloved? By: dill Barshay By now, you know about the endless speculation on whether the Trump administration might close the U.S. Department of Coucation. it remains just that: speculation. Congress would have to be involved. and even a Senate and House controlied by the same party as President Donald Trump would not necessarily go along with this idea. However, since taling office, Trump has sald he would like to use exccutive action to dismantle or at least diminish the agency. And in a statement about his nomination of Linda McMahon for education secretary. Trump underscored his campaign pledge to disband the department, saying. We will send Education BACK TO THE STATES, and Linda wil spearhead that effort." The mere specter of shuttering an agency that commands more than 5200 billion has led parents, students, teachers, policy experts and politicians to wonder about (and in some cases plan for) the possible effects on their children and communities. Collectively, state and local goverriments spend far more on education than the federal government does. With federal dollars connected to many rules about how that money can be spent, however, the education Department does play a signiflcant role in how schools and colleges operete. Deleting the agensy would not undo federal law providing money for students in rural places, with disabilities or who come from low-income families, but doling out that money and overseeing it could get messy. Republican Sen. Mike Rounds af South Dakota late last year introduced a bll to unwind the Education Department and spread its work across other federal agencies. U.S. Rep. Thomas Massle of Kentucky also introduced legislation to abolish the department. The Hechinger Report tried to answer some of the questions ralsed by the possible dismantling of the department, consulting experts and asvocates on sturlent loans, special education, financial ald, school funch and beyond. Nothing is out of the realm of possibility, however complicated. A much smaller agency that gulded Congress on science, the Office of Technology Assessment; simply had its budget set to rero back in 1995 - and just like that, it was gone. The Education Department, created in 1979, reaches far wider and deeper, into essentially every community nationwlde. Its impact is felt not so much in what students are learning every day but whether their schools can pay for the special equipment or training that might be essential for sorme students with disabilities; if they can pay to have an extra teacher to work with struggling readers; whether a student from a low-income houschold can get federal grant money to pay for college; and whether a college student with a federally backed student loan might ever have it forghen. At the same time, many education programs, as well as some that touch schools, exist entirely outside of the Education Department. It doesn't oversce the education of students whose parents live on military bases, for example, or students who attend school on Native American reservations. (Those programs are managed within the Defense and Interior departments, respectively.) 4

Latest Social Sciences Questions

The Education Department also doesn't run the school lunch or breakfast programs, which are by the Agricutture Department. The nation's blegest child care programs for low-income families? Those aren"t part of the Educamon Department's job, elther; they are managed ty the Department of Health and Human Services. Early Education What would happen to federal early education programs? The most well-known and biggest federal early childhood programs, Head Start and the Child Care Development Block Grant, are not a part of the Education Department - they re administered by the Department of Health and Human Services. So they would not be directly affected by an Education Department shutdown. But Education does oversee and pay for some smaller early learning programs and early childhood rescarch. For example, the. Preschool Development Grant - Birth through Five, provides funding for state early learning programs and is overseen jointly with HHS, Other programs, such as Promise Neighborhoods and Full Service Community Schools, also address the early years and family support. The Department of Education also is home to several research centers that focus on young children, many of which conduct long-term studies or research almed at improving the lives of infants and toddlers with disabilities. Those programs, if they were not cut, would have to move to another agency. Its Effect on Grades K-12 Closing the Department of Education would not undo it. Title I - a program established in 1965 that provides money to schools with large numbers of low-income students - is part of federal law. If the Education Department were to be eliminated, the most likely scenario is that Title I money would flow through another federal agency. Major cuts to the program are unlikely. While Trump and others close to him have said they would like to cut federal education funding streams like Title I, any cuts would need to go through Congress - where that funding has broad political support among both Republicans and Democrats. That is especially true for Title \( l \) : Almost all school districts in the country get a share of that money. So, it's unlikely Title I "would ever see an actual cut, and certainly not a substantial cut," said Nora Gordon, a professor of public policy at Georgetown University's McCourt School of Public Policy. She said even members of Congress who are hostile to other federal programs that allocate funds for lowincome families would be reluctant to defund Title I.
What might happen if the Iducation Department were cloved? By: dill Barshay By now, you know about the endless speculation on whether the Trump administration might close the U.S. Department of Coucation. it remains just that: speculation. Congress would have to be involved. and even a Senate and House controlied by the same party as President Donald Trump would not necessarily go along with this idea. However, since taling office, Trump has sald he would like to use exccutive action to dismantle or at least diminish the agency. And in a statement about his nomination of Linda McMahon for education secretary. Trump underscored his campaign pledge to disband the department, saying. We will send Education BACK TO THE STATES, and Linda wil spearhead that effort." The mere specter of shuttering an agency that commands more than 5200 billion has led parents, students, teachers, policy experts and politicians to wonder about (and in some cases plan for) the possible effects on their children and communities. Collectively, state and local goverriments spend far more on education than the federal government does. With federal dollars connected to many rules about how that money can be spent, however, the education Department does play a signiflcant role in how schools and colleges operete. Deleting the agensy would not undo federal law providing money for students in rural places, with disabilities or who come from low-income families, but doling out that money and overseeing it could get messy. Republican Sen. Mike Rounds af South Dakota late last year introduced a bll to unwind the Education Department and spread its work across other federal agencies. U.S. Rep. Thomas Massle of Kentucky also introduced legislation to abolish the department. The Hechinger Report tried to answer some of the questions ralsed by the possible dismantling of the department, consulting experts and asvocates on sturlent loans, special education, financial ald, school funch and beyond. Nothing is out of the realm of possibility, however complicated. A much smaller agency that gulded Congress on science, the Office of Technology Assessment; simply had its budget set to rero back in 1995 - and just like that, it was gone. The Education Department, created in 1979, reaches far wider and deeper, into essentially every community nationwlde. Its impact is felt not so much in what students are learning every day but whether their schools can pay for the special equipment or training that might be essential for sorme students with disabilities; if they can pay to have an extra teacher to work with struggling readers; whether a student from a low-income houschold can get federal grant money to pay for college; and whether a college student with a federally backed student loan might ever have it forghen. At the same time, many education programs, as well as some that touch schools, exist entirely outside of the Education Department. It doesn't oversce the education of students whose parents live on military bases, for example, or students who attend school on Native American reservations. (Those programs are managed within the Defense and Interior departments, respectively.) 4
¡Prueba Premium ahora!
¡Prueba Premium y hazle a Thoth AI preguntas de matemáticas ilimitadas ahora!
Quizas mas tarde Hazte Premium
Estudiar puede ser una verdadera lucha
¿Por qué no estudiarlo en UpStudy?
Seleccione su plan a continuación
Prima

Puedes disfrutar

Empieza ahora
  • Explicaciones paso a paso
  • Tutores expertos en vivo 24/7
  • Número ilimitado de preguntas
  • Sin interrupciones
  • Acceso completo a Respuesta y Solución
  • Acceso completo al chat de PDF, al chat de UpStudy y al chat de navegación
Básico

Totalmente gratis pero limitado

  • Solución limitada
Bienvenido a ¡Estudia ahora!
Inicie sesión para continuar con el recorrido de Thoth AI Chat
Continuar con correo electrónico
O continuar con
Al hacer clic en "Iniciar sesión", acepta nuestros términos y condiciones. Términos de Uso & Política de privacidad