NAME: MashaG 2. MOM and Tyler are trying to solve the equation \( -\frac{3}{5} x=6 \). o Mai says, "I think we should add \( \frac{3}{5} \) to each side because that is the opposite of \( -\frac{3}{5} \) ". o Tyler says, "I think we should multiply each side by \( -\frac{5}{3} \) because that is the reciprocal of \( -\frac{3}{5} \) ". a. Which person's strategy should they use? Explain your reasoning. (a) b. Write an equation that can be solved using the other person's strategy.
Solución de inteligencia artificial de Upstudy
Responder
Solución
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c58a4/c58a4c7bee590f9602683202ac25334043919006" alt=""
¡Inicia sesión para desbloquear respuestas gratis!
Una plataforma de aprendizaje en la que confían millones de estudiantes y profesores reales.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9dd13/9dd1353b0340c8826ad9e98fd834c164f2ba9908" alt="star-icon"
Respondido por UpStudy AI y revisado por un tutor profesional
Mind Expander
To solve the equation \( -\frac{3}{5} x = 6 \), Tyler's strategy of multiplying both sides by \( -\frac{5}{3} \) is definitely the way to go! When you multiply by the reciprocal of the coefficient, you're effectively isolating \( x \). So, Tyler's approach will directly lead to a solution: \( x = 6 \times -\frac{5}{3} = -10 \). Mai's strategy, while based on the notion of opposites, would not isolate \( x \) correctly since it adds rather than eliminates the term. For Mai's approach using addition, you could set up an equation like this: \( -\frac{3}{5} x + \frac{3}{5} = 6 + \frac{3}{5} \). Solving it would show how adding \( \frac{3}{5} \) to one side leads to a complex arrangement, requiring additional steps to solve for \( x \). Just remember, choosing the right method can save you time—after all, who doesn't love a shortcut?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a6b0/4a6b09f9aefbc871618deaaae5ef0bbe0a6b610e" alt=""