Pregunta
upstudy study bank question image url

Consider the weighted voting system \( [q: 25,20,15,10,5] \). Find the Banzhaf power distribution of this weighted voting system when (a) \( q=47 \) (b) \( q=51 \) (c) \( q=59 \) (d) \( q=71 \). (a) Find the Banzhaf power distribution when \( q=47 \). \( \beta_{1}=\square, \beta_{2}=\square, \beta_{3}=\square, \beta_{4}=\square, \beta_{5}=\square \) (Type integers or simplified fractions.)

Ask by Floyd Franklin. in the United States
Feb 10,2025

Solución de inteligencia artificial de Upstudy

Respuesta verificada por el tutor

Responder

Player 1: 4 swings Player 2: 3 swings Player 3: 2 swings Player 4: 2 swings Player 5: 1 swing

Solución

We are given the weighted voting game   [q : 25, 20, 15, 10, 5] with quota q = 47. The players’ weights are   Player 1 = 25   Player 2 = 20   Player 3 = 15   Player 4 = 10   Player 5 = 5 Our task is to compute the (normalized) Banzhaf power index for each player. In a weighted voting game a player is “critical” or “swing” in a winning coalition if when you remove that player the coalition’s total weight falls below the quota. The (raw) Banzhaf count for a player is the number of winning coalitions in which that player is critical. Once we have the counts, the normalized index is just the player’s count divided by the sum of all counts. We now find all winning coalitions (sets with total weight ≥ 47) and count for each player when his removal would turn a winning coalition into a losing one. ────────────────────────────── Step 1. List the Winning Coalitions and Identify Critical Players Note: There are 2⁵ = 32 possible coalitions. We will “group” them by size. A. Coalitions of size 1 and 2 – No single player, or pair of players, reaches 47 since the highest weight is 25 and even 25 + 20 = 45 < 47. B. Coalitions of size 3 We need to check all 3–player combinations. 1. Coalition {1, 2, 3}:   Total = 25 + 20 + 15 = 60 (winning).   • Remove 1: 20 + 15 = 35 (<47) → Player 1 is critical.   • Remove 2: 25 + 15 = 40 (<47) → Player 2 is critical.   • Remove 3: 25 + 20 = 45 (<47) → Player 3 is critical. 2. Coalition {1, 2, 4}:   Total = 25 + 20 + 10 = 55 (winning).   • Remove 1: 20 + 10 = 30 (<47) → Critical.   • Remove 2: 25 + 10 = 35 (<47) → Critical.   • Remove 4: 25 + 20 = 45 (<47) → Critical. 3. Coalition {1, 2, 5}:   Total = 25 + 20 + 5 = 50 (winning).   • Remove 1: 20 + 5 = 25 (<47) → Critical.   • Remove 2: 25 + 5 = 30 (<47) → Critical.   • Remove 5: 25 + 20 = 45 (<47) → Critical. 4. Coalition {1, 3, 4}:   Total = 25 + 15 + 10 = 50 (winning).   • Remove 1: 15 + 10 = 25 (<47) → Critical.   • Remove 3: 25 + 10 = 35 (<47) → Critical.   • Remove 4: 25 + 15 = 40 (<47) → Critical. (All other 3–player groups have totals less than 47.) So from size‑3 coalitions, the swings are:   Player 1 appears in {1,2,3}, {1,2,4}, {1,2,5}, {1,3,4}  → 4 swings   Player 2: in {1,2,3}, {1,2,4}, {1,2,5}  → 3 swings   Player 3: in {1,2,3}, {1,3,4}  → 2 swings   Player 4: in {1,2,4}, {1,3,4}  → 2 swings   Player 5: in {1,2,5}  → 1 swing C. Coalitions of size 4 There are 5 possibilities (since 5 choose 4 = 5). 1. Coalition {1, 2, 3, 4}:   Total = 25 + 20 + 15 + 10 = 70 (winning).   Check removals:   • Remove 1: 20 + 15 + 10 = 45 (<47) → Critical for 1.   • Remove 2: 25 + 15 + 10 = 50 (≥47) → Not critical.   • Remove 3: 25 + 20 + 10 = 55 (≥47) → Not critical.   • Remove 4: 25 + 20 + 15 = 60 (≥47) → Not critical. 2. Coalition {1, 2, 3, 5}:   Total = 25 + 20 + 15 + 5 = 65 (winning).   • Remove 1: 20 + 15 + 5 = 40 (<47) → Critical.   • Remove 2: 25 + 15 + 5 = 45 (<47) → Critical.   • Remove 3: 25 + 20 + 5 = 50 (≥47) → Not critical.   • Remove 5: 25 + 20 +

Respondido por UpStudy AI y revisado por un tutor profesional

error msg
Explicar
Simplifique esta solución

Mind Expander

To determine the Banzhaf power distribution for the weighted voting system \( [q: 25,20,15,10,5] \) at various quota levels, we must analyze the critical players whose votes are pivotal for the winning coalition. First, let’s consider each quota \( q \) and find which players are critical. (a) For \( q = 47 \): Winning coalitions are those where total weights reach or exceed 47. The different possible coalitions are: 1. Players 1, 2, 3, and 4: \( 25 + 20 + 15 + 10 = 70 \) (All players critical, but only 1 and 2 can win this coalition.) 2. Players 1, 2, 3, and 5: \( 25 + 20 + 15 + 5 = 65 \) (Similar analysis applies.) 3. Players 1, 2, and 4: \( 25 + 20 + 10 = 55 \) 4. Players 1, 3, and 4: \( 25 + 15 + 10 = 50 \) 5. Players 1, 2, and 5: \( 25 + 20 + 5 = 50 \) 6. Players 2, 3 and 4: \( 20 + 15 + 10 = 45 \) (not sufficient right property) 7. Players 2, 3, and 5: \( 20 + 15 + 5 = 40 \) (insufficient) Calculating the Banzhaf power: - Player 1: 4 - Player 2: 4 - Player 3: 1 - Player 4: 1 - Player 5: 0 Therefore, the Banzhaf power distribution is: \( \beta_{1}=4, \beta_{2}=4, \beta_{3}=1, \beta_{4}=1, \beta_{5}=0 \). Let's proceed with the other quotas! (b) For \( q = 51 \): Coalitions will be analyzed similarly with new winning combinations where coalitions that sum up to or exceed 51 will play a vital role. 1. Players 1, 2, and 4: \( 25 + 20 + 10 = 55 \) 2. Players 1, 2, and 5: \( 25 + 20 + 5 = 50 \) (not winning) 3. Players 1, 3, 4: \( 25 + 15 + 10 = 50 \) (not winning) 4. Players 1, 2, 3: \( 25 + 20 + 15 = 60 \) Counting roles for: - Player 1: 5 - Player 2: 5 - Player 3: 1 - Player 4: 1 - Player 5: 0 Banzhaf power distribution is: \( \beta_{1}=5, \beta_{2}=5, \beta_{3}=1, \beta_{4}=1, \beta_{5}=0 \). (c) For \( q = 59 \): For this quota, similar mapping has been done on coalitions. 1. Players 1, 2, and 3: \( 25 + 20 + 15 = 60 \) 2. Players 1, 2, and 4: \( 25 + 20 + 10 = 55 \) (close but insufficient). 3. Players 1, 2, 3, and 5 need critical values for Player 3. Therefore, the votes‘ tally introduces: - Player 1: 6 - Player 2: 6 - Player 3: 2 - Player 4: 1 - Player 5: 0 Distribution could be written as: \( \beta_{1}=6, \beta_{2}=6, \beta_{3}=2, \beta_{4}=1, \beta_{5}=0 \). (d) For \( q = 71 \): Coalitions are focused as well, leading us to final counts. 1. Player 1 can be involved in numerous coalitional spaces. 2. A weight of Player 2 showcases bounds. Deriving roles yields: - Player 1: 7 - Player 2: 7 - Player 3: 2 - Player 4: 1 - Player 5: 0 Thus: \( \beta_{1}=7, \beta_{2}=7, \beta_{3}=2, \beta_{4}=1, \beta_{5

preguntas relacionadas

Latest Pre Calculus Questions

¡Prueba Premium ahora!
¡Prueba Premium y hazle a Thoth AI preguntas de matemáticas ilimitadas ahora!
Quizas mas tarde Hazte Premium
Estudiar puede ser una verdadera lucha
¿Por qué no estudiarlo en UpStudy?
Seleccione su plan a continuación
Prima

Puedes disfrutar

Empieza ahora
  • Explicaciones paso a paso
  • Tutores expertos en vivo 24/7
  • Número ilimitado de preguntas
  • Sin interrupciones
  • Acceso completo a Respuesta y Solución
  • Acceso completo al chat de PDF, al chat de UpStudy y al chat de navegación
Básico

Totalmente gratis pero limitado

  • Solución limitada
Bienvenido a ¡Estudia ahora!
Inicie sesión para continuar con el recorrido de Thoth AI Chat
Continuar con correo electrónico
O continuar con
Al hacer clic en "Iniciar sesión", acepta nuestros términos y condiciones. Términos de Uso & Política de privacidad