shawn has \( \$ 600 \) to spend at a bicycle store for some new gear and biking outfits. Assume all prices listed include tax. He buys a new bicycle for \( \$ 237.49 \). He buys 3 bicycle reflectors for \( \$ 14.57 \) each and a pair of bike gloves for \( \$ 34.52 \). He plans to spend some or all of the money he has left to buy new biking outfits for \( \$ 71.07 \), each. se the drop-down menu below to write an inequality representing \( o \), the number of outfits he can buy while staying within his budget.

To set up the inequality for the number of outfits \( o \) that Shawn can buy while staying within his budget, we need to follow these steps: 1. **Calculate the total amount spent on the bicycle and accessories:** - Cost of the bicycle: \( 237.49 \) - Cost of 3 bicycle reflectors: \( 3 \times 14.57 \) - Cost of bike gloves: \( 34.52 \) 2. **Calculate the total spent so far:** \[ \text{Total spent} = 237.49 + (3 \times 14.57) + 34.52 \] 3. **Determine the remaining budget:** \[ \text{Remaining budget} = 600 - \text{Total spent} \] 4. **Set up the inequality for the number of outfits \( o \):** Each outfit costs \( 71.07 \), so the total cost for \( o \) outfits is \( 71.07o \). The inequality representing the remaining budget is: \[ 71.07o \leq \text{Remaining budget} \] Now, let's calculate the total spent and the remaining budget. First, we calculate the cost of the reflectors: \[ 3 \times 14.57 \] Then, we can find the total spent and the remaining budget. Let's perform these calculations. Calculate the value by following steps: - step0: Calculate: \(3\times 14.57\) - step1: Multiply the numbers: \(43.71\) Calculate or simplify the expression \( 237.49 + (3 * 14.57) + 34.52 \). Calculate the value by following steps: - step0: Calculate: \(237.49+\left(3\times 14.57\right)+34.52\) - step1: Multiply the numbers: \(237.49+43.71+34.52\) - step2: Add the numbers: \(315.72\) Calculate or simplify the expression \( 600 - 315.72 \). Calculate the value by following steps: - step0: Calculate: \(600-315.72\) - step1: Subtract the numbers: \(284.28\) Let's summarize the calculations: 1. **Cost of 3 bicycle reflectors:** \[ 3 \times 14.57 = 43.71 \] 2. **Total amount spent on the bicycle and accessories:** \[ 237.49 + 43.71 + 34.52 = 315.72 \] 3. **Remaining budget:** \[ 600 - 315.72 = 284.28 \] Now, we can set up the inequality for the number of outfits \( o \) that Shawn can buy: \[ 71.07o \leq 284.28 \] This inequality represents the maximum number of outfits Shawn can purchase while staying within his budget.